Urban-Rural Divide and Access to Addiction Treatment in Poland: Case Study of Pomorskie Region

Executive Summary

This policy paper examines the significant urban-rural divide in addiction treatment access in Poland's Pomorskie region, where approximately 40% of Poland's population resides in rural areas. The research identifies critical barriers that rural residents face when seeking addiction treatment, including geographic isolation, transportation challenges, workforce shortages, and heightened stigma in close-knit communities.

The analysis reveals that urban centers in Pomorskie (particularly the Tri-City area of Gdańsk, Gdynia, and Sopot) maintain a more developed addiction treatment infrastructure, with better access to inpatient detoxification, comprehensive outpatient services, day treatment programs, and specialized professionals. In contrast, rural areas often have limited or no dedicated facilities, forcing residents to travel long distances for care, with wait times extending to several months in some cases.

Key barriers identified include:

• Transportation challenges: Limited public transportation and long distances create significant logistical and financial burdens for rural residents seeking treatment.
• Workforce shortages: Rural areas face a severe maldistribution of addiction specialists, with fewer certified professionals choosing to practice outside major urban centers.
• Stigma and social barriers: The close-knit nature of rural communities limits privacy and intensifies social judgment, deterring help-seeking behavior.

The paper presents evidence-based policy interventions structured as a progressive implementation strategy:

Short-term interventions (1-2 years):

• Implement a telemedicine network for addiction services with an investment of €2.0 million
• Establish a transportation assistance initiative (€1.2 million) to overcome geographic barriers

Medium-term strategies (2-5 years):

• Develop a rural addiction workforce through scholarships, loan forgiveness, and competitive salary supplements
• Expand community-based treatment using a hub-and-spoke model with 2-3 regional centers supporting 10-15 "spokes" in rural primary care facilities

Long-term system transformation (5-10 years):

• Create an integrated rural addiction prevention, treatment, and recovery system
• Implement evidence-based prevention programs in schools and communities
• Integrate routine addiction screening into primary healthcare
• Support the development of recovery community organizations and peer support services

The recommended funding strategy combines €7.5 million from EU Structural and Investment Funds, €4.2 million from the National Health Fund, €3.1 million from regional government, €1.8 million from municipal contributions, and €1.2 million from private foundation grants.

International models from Estonia, Scotland, Vermont (USA), Finland, Australia, and Canada offer valuable lessons for Pomorskie, though implementation must be adapted to Poland's specific healthcare, cultural, and regulatory context. Evidence suggests that successful implementation of these recommendations could yield significant returns on investment (approximately €3.40 per €1 invested) through reduced healthcare costs, decreased criminal justice involvement, and improved productivity.

The paper emphasizes that addressing the urban-rural divide in addiction treatment is not only a matter of public health but also of social justice and regional development, requiring sustained political will, diverse stakeholder engagement, and a commitment to evidence-based approaches.

Introduction to the Urban-Rural Divide in Healthcare Access

The urban-rural divide presents a significant and persistent challenge to equitable healthcare delivery in Poland, with particularly acute consequences for access to addiction treatment services. This disparity is not unique to Poland; across Europe and globally, rural populations frequently encounter barriers to healthcare stemming from geographical isolation, lower population density, distinct socioeconomic profiles, and infrastructural limitations (OECD, 2022). In the Pomorskie Voivodeship (region) of Poland, which encompasses the major metropolitan Tri-City area (Gdańsk, Gdynia, Sopot) alongside extensive and diverse rural territories, this divide manifests in pronounced disparities in treatment accessibility, the range and quality of services offered, and ultimately, in health outcomes for individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs).

A critical starting point is understanding Poland's demographic landscape. Approximately 40% of Poland's population resides in rural areas (World Bank, 2023). This substantial proportion underscores the urgency of addressing healthcare access in these communities. While precise, current data on the distribution of addiction treatment facilities specifically for Pomorskie's rural areas requires detailed analysis of National Health Fund (NFZ) and Ministry of Health data, national trends often indicate a concentration of specialized services in urban centers (Krajowe Biuro ds. Przeciwdziałania Narkomanii [KBPN], annual reports). The European Committee of the Regions (2024) has broadly highlighted concerns regarding mental health service accessibility, noting that conditions like SUDs, which frequently co-occur with other mental health issues ("up to 80% of patients in certain drug treatment groups have other mental health problems," p. 5), necessitate comprehensive and easily accessible care—a standard often unmet in non-urban settings. The Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission, in its monitoring of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Pomorskie Region, points to general disparities in service access, which, while not specific to addiction, implies challenges for specialized care (JRC, 2023).

This policy paper examines the specific challenges in the Pomorskie region. It analyzes structural determinants (e.g., infrastructure, workforce, funding, national policy frameworks) and social determinants (e.g., stigma, socioeconomic status, cultural norms, community resources, role of religious organizations) contributing to these treatment disparities. It aims to propose evidence-based policy interventions, drawing on Polish national strategies, European best practices, and relevant international experiences, tailored to the Polish context.

The significance of this issue is amplified by evolving patterns of substance use. While comprehensive, recent statistics comparing urban-rural addiction case increases specifically for Pomorskie need to be sourced from regional health authorities or specific KBPN analyses, national reports often indicate rising concerns about alcohol use disorders and the misuse of new psychoactive substances in various Polish communities (KBPN, 2023). Addressing these trends requires targeted policy responses that acknowledge the unique challenges of rural healthcare delivery and strategically leverage existing infrastructure and community resources. The Cleveland Clinic defines Substance Use Disorder (SUD) as "a mental health condition where you experience a problematic pattern of substance use that leads to impairment or distress" (Cleveland Clinic, n.d.), emphasizing its nature as a treatable health condition requiring accessible and equitable care. The COVID-19 pandemic further complicated service delivery, with initial disruptions to in-person services and a subsequent, uneven shift towards telehealth, the long-term impacts of which are still being assessed in rural Polish contexts (GUS, 2022; Wnuk & Marcinkowski, 2021).

Substance Use Epidemiology in Poland: Urban-Rural Nuances

Understanding the specific substance use patterns in Poland, and how they may differ between urban and rural areas of Pomorskie, is crucial for targeted interventions. Nationally, alcohol remains the most prevalent substance of abuse, with high rates of hazardous drinking reported across the population (Państwowa Agencja Rozwiązywania Problemów Alkoholowych [PARPA], 2023). In rural areas, traditional patterns of alcohol consumption, sometimes deeply embedded in social life, can contribute to higher rates of alcohol-related problems and lower treatment-seeking (Moskalewicz & Kocoń, 2020).

Regarding illicit drugs, urban areas, particularly larger cities like Gdańsk, tend to show higher prevalence rates for substances like cannabis, amphetamines, MDMA, and cocaine, often linked to nightlife and different socio-economic dynamics (KBPN, 2023). However, rural areas are not immune. There is growing concern about the spread of new psychoactive substances (NPS) and the misuse of prescription medications (e.g., opioids, benzodiazepines) in less urbanized regions, sometimes due to limited access to mental health support or pain management (Poprawa et al., 2019). Data from regional Sanitary-Epidemiological Stations (Sanepid) and police statistics for Pomorskie could provide more granular insights into these local trends. The methods of substance acquisition and social networks surrounding use may also differ significantly between Pomorskie's urban centers and its rural communities, impacting prevention and intervention strategies.

Poland's National Drug Policy Framework

Addiction treatment in Poland is guided by the National Health Program (Narodowy Program Zdrowia) and specifically by the National Program for Counteracting Drug Addiction (Krajowy Program Przeciwdziałania Narkomanii), updated periodically by the Ministry of Health and coordinated by the KBPN. This framework outlines priorities for prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, and harm reduction (Ministry of Health, 2021). Regional authorities, like the Marshal's Office in Pomorskie, are responsible for developing and implementing regional health strategies, including those for addiction, in line with national guidelines and funded through the NFZ and local government budgets. The effectiveness of these policies in rural areas depends heavily on how well national objectives are translated into local action, considering the specific resource constraints and needs of these communities. Recent healthcare reforms in Poland, often focused on primary care strengthening and hospital network reorganization, may have indirect impacts on addiction service funding and integration, which require careful monitoring in regions like Pomorskie (NFZ, 2023).

Global and European Context: Urban-Rural Disparities in Addiction Treatment

The challenges in Pomorskie are mirrored elsewhere. In the United States, significant urban-rural disparities exist in accessing treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD), with rural areas often lacking specialized services and MOUD providers (AIR, 2021; Haffajee et al., 2023). While MOUD is a key evidence-based treatment (CDC, 2024; NIDA, 2020), its availability and acceptance can vary.

It is crucial to look at European contexts with healthcare systems more analogous to Poland's. Countries like Germany and France, with mixed public-private systems and strong social insurance, also report challenges in ensuring equitable mental health and addiction service distribution to rural and remote areas, often related to workforce shortages and travel distances (Rechel et al., 2011; WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2022). Scandinavian countries, despite robust welfare systems, also face issues in delivering specialized care to sparsely populated northern regions, often relying on integrated care models and telemedicine (Helgason et al., 2019). These European examples offer insights into policy levers such as targeted funding for underserved areas, workforce incentives, and the structured development of integrated and digital health solutions. EU structural funds (e.g., European Social Fund Plus, European Regional Development Fund) are available to member states to address health disparities, and Pomorskie's utilization of these funds for addiction services in rural areas should be a key area of investigation (European Commission, n.d.).

Structural and Social Determinants in Pomorskie

Structural Determinants

The limited availability and accessibility of services in rural Pomorskie creates a fundamental barrier to addiction treatment. Data from the Pomorskie Voivodeship Marshal's Office or the regional NFZ branch would be needed to quantify the exact number and type of addiction treatment facilities in rural counties versus urban centers. It is probable that specialized services, including comprehensive MOUD programs (methadone and buprenorphine maintenance), are predominantly located in the Tri-City area. This forces rural residents into long, costly, and time-consuming travel, a significant barrier for those with limited mobility, employment, or childcare responsibilities (KBPN, 2023).

Workforce shortages further exacerbate the problem. Attracting and retaining qualified addiction specialists (psychiatrists, certified addiction therapists, psychologists, social workers) in rural Poland, including Pomorskie, is a well-documented challenge (GUS, 2023; Klich & Gadomska, 2021). This leads to longer waiting times, less intensive care, and a narrower range of therapeutic options. The underdeveloped infrastructure, including inconsistent public transportation networks in remote parts of Pomorskie and variable access to high-speed internet, is critical for effective telehealth implementation (Urząd Komunikacji Elektronicznej, 2023).

Funding disparities and allocation mechanisms present another challenge. NFZ contracting mechanisms and local government health budgets may not adequately account for the higher per-capita cost of delivering comprehensive services in sparsely populated rural areas, potentially leading to underfunded and less resilient services (Cylus et al., 2019). Additionally, the level of integration between primary healthcare (POZ) and specialized addiction services in rural Pomorskie is often limited. GPs may lack training, resources, or time for screening, brief interventions, or referrals for SUDs (Wójtowicz & Opolski, 2020).

Social Determinants

Stigma and anonymity concerns are particularly intense in smaller, close-knit rural communities where anonymity is scarce. Fear of gossip, social exclusion, and reputational damage can strongly deter individuals and families from seeking help (Oksińska & Gmaj, 2018). Socioeconomic factors also play a significant role, as rural areas in Pomorskie may exhibit higher rates of unemployment, lower average incomes, and varying educational attainment levels compared to urban centers (GUS Pomorskie, 2023). These factors are established risk factors for SUDs and also create barriers to accessing and completing treatment (Marmot, 2005).

Cultural norms, awareness, and health literacy significantly influence help-seeking behaviors. Local attitudes towards alcohol consumption (e.g., high tolerance for heavy drinking in certain social contexts), mental health, and formal treatment-seeking significantly influence help-seeking behaviors. Lower health literacy and limited awareness of available, effective treatment options can also be prevalent in some rural communities (PARPA, 2023).

The role of religious organizations and traditional support systems cannot be overlooked. The Catholic Church and other religious organizations often play a significant role in rural Polish community life. Some offer direct support services (e.g., faith-based recovery groups, counseling), while others may influence community attitudes towards addiction and treatment. Understanding and appropriately engaging with these entities can be crucial (Zarzycka & Zietek, 2019). Traditional family and community support networks, while potentially strong, may also be sources of stigma or enable problematic substance use if not guided by professional support.

Evidence-Based Policy Interventions to Bridge the Divide

Addressing the urban-rural gap requires a multi-pronged, culturally sensitive approach, grounded in Poland's National Health Program and utilizing evidence-based strategies.

Strengthening and Equitably Distributing Services, Including MOUD

Poland must advocate for NFZ policies and regional Pomorskie health strategies that incentivize the establishment of a broader range of addiction services in rural counties. This includes outpatient counseling, day treatment programs, and, where appropriate and evidence-based, MOUD (methadone, buprenorphine, naltrexone) provision. This requires addressing regulatory and attitudinal barriers to MOUD in Poland (Misiak & Szcześniak, 2021). Germany's efforts to improve rural healthcare access through "regional health centers" (regionale Gesundheitszentren) that co-locate various services, including mental health and potentially addiction support, could offer a model (Bundesgesundheitsministerium, 2022).

Integration of Addiction Treatment into Primary Care (POZ)

Developing and funding national and regional programs to train and support primary care physicians and nurses in rural Pomorskie to screen for SUDs (e.g., using AUDIT, DUDIT), provide evidence-based brief interventions, manage less severe cases in collaboration with specialists, and facilitate referrals is essential. This includes training on co-occurring disorders. The WHO advocates for integrating mental health (including SUDs) into primary care as a key strategy to improve access and reduce stigma, particularly in resource-constrained settings (WHO, 2018).

Strategic Implementation of Telehealth and Mobile Services

Investing in robust telehealth infrastructure (broadband, platforms, equipment) in rural Pomorskie and refining regulatory frameworks to support its use for addiction counseling, psychiatric consultations, and potentially remote MOUD supervision where clinically appropriate and secure is crucial. Addressing digital literacy gaps must occur concurrently. While the Rhode Island Buprenorphine Hotline (Raney et al., 2020) is a US example, similar pilot programs for tele-psychiatry or tele-counseling in rural areas of other EU countries could offer more directly transferable lessons for Poland, considering GDPR and EU-specific healthcare regulations.

Exploring the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of mobile treatment units staffed by addiction therapists and nurses to reach remote communities in Pomorskie, offering screening, brief interventions, counseling, and referral facilitation should be considered. This model has been used in various European countries for different health outreach programs (Marino et al., 2016).

Workforce Development and Support Initiatives

Implementing targeted financial incentives (e.g., enhanced NFZ contract rates for rural services, loan forgiveness programs, housing support) and robust professional development opportunities (e.g., specialized training, supervision) to attract and retain qualified addiction specialists and mental health professionals in rural Pomorskie is essential. France has used "contrats d'engagement de service public" (CESP) offering stipends to medical students who commit to working in underserved areas; similar models could be adapted for addiction specialists in Poland (Ministère de la Santé et de la Prévention, n.d.).

Community-Based Programs, Stigma Reduction, and Harm Reduction

Funding and supporting culturally appropriate community-led initiatives, peer support networks (e.g., self-help groups), and public awareness campaigns tailored to rural Pomorskie to reduce stigma, improve health literacy about SUDs, and promote help-seeking is vital. Peer support services are increasingly recognized in Europe for improving engagement and recovery outcomes (Reif et al., 2014). Ensuring that harm reduction services (e.g., needle and syringe programs where relevant, naloxone distribution and training, outreach to vulnerable populations) are accessible in rural areas, as outlined in Poland's national strategy, may require innovative delivery models (KBPN, 2023).

Leveraging EU Funding and Inter-Sectoral Collaboration

Proactively seeking and strategically utilizing EU structural and investment funds (e.g., ESF+, ERDF) designated for health equity, social inclusion, and regional development to bolster addiction services in rural Pomorskie is essential. Fostering strong inter-sectoral collaboration between health services, social welfare, education, law enforcement, local governments, and NGOs will strengthen the overall approach.

Current Challenges in Addiction Policy Implementation in Pomorskie

Implementing effective addiction policies in rural Pomorskie, despite national frameworks, faces significant hurdles. Securing adequate, long-term NFZ contracts and local government funding that reflects the true costs of service delivery in sparsely populated rural areas remains a primary challenge. Competitive funding models may disadvantage smaller, rural providers.

Polish regulations may need ongoing review to fully support innovative models like expanded telehealth applications for SUDs (ensuring data privacy and quality of care), flexible roles for rural healthcare providers, and streamlined processes for establishing new services in underserved areas. A persistent lack of detailed, localized, and regularly updated data on SUD prevalence, specific substance use patterns, treatment needs, service capacity, utilization, and outcomes in rural districts of Pomorskie hinders evidence-based planning, resource allocation, and program evaluation (GUS, KBPN – need for more sub-regional breakdowns).

Achieving seamless collaboration and integrated care pathways between diverse actors (NFZ, POZ, specialized psychiatric and addiction services, social welfare centers, schools, NGOs, law enforcement, local municipalities) in often fragmented rural administrative systems is complex but essential. While telehealth holds promise, unequal access to reliable internet, necessary devices, and digital literacy skills among both providers and patients in some rural parts of Pomorskie can limit its reach and effectiveness, potentially widening disparities if not addressed (UKE, 2023).

The COVID-19 pandemic has strained health systems, potentially diverting resources and attention. It also shifted some care to remote models, the long-term sustainability and equity of which in rural addiction treatment needs careful assessment (Wnuk & Marcinkowski, 2021). Ongoing healthcare reforms must explicitly consider the needs of rural addiction services. Overcoming deeply ingrained stigma and tailoring interventions to the specific cultural contexts and needs of diverse rural communities in Pomorskie requires sustained effort, community participation, and culturally competent professionals.

Addressing the urban-rural divide in addiction treatment in the Pomorskie region is a matter of public health, social justice, and regional development. By strengthening data collection, adapting national policies to local realities, investing in a diverse and well-supported rural workforce, fostering innovation in service delivery, and promoting genuine community engagement, Poland can make substantial progress in ensuring that all its citizens, irrespective of their place of residence, have equitable access to the comprehensive addiction prevention, treatment, and recovery support they need and deserve.

Current State of Addiction Services in Pomorskie Region

Addressing substance use disorders (SUDs) and behavioral addictions effectively requires a comprehensive, accessible, and well-funded network of services. The burden of addiction, encompassing significant health, social, and economic costs, necessitates robust policy responses (Rehm et al., 2009). In Poland, as in many European countries, alcohol use disorder remains a primary public health challenge, alongside evolving concerns regarding illicit drug use and, increasingly, behavioral addictions such as gambling or problematic internet use (European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction [EMCDDA], 2023a; National Bureau for Drug Prevention [KBPN], 2020).

The Polish addiction treatment system operates primarily within the public healthcare framework, financed by the National Health Fund (NFZ), and guided by national strategies like the National Programme for Counteracting Drug Addiction and the National Programme for Counteracting Addictions (Ministerstwo Zdrowia, n.d.; Krajowe Centrum Przeciwdziałania Uzależnieniom, n.d.). The availability, quality, and equity of access to these services within specific regions, such as Pomorskie Voivodeship, are critical determinants of treatment outcomes and public health improvement. This chapter examines the current state of addiction services in the Pomorskie region, highlighting potential disparities, particularly between urban and rural areas, and discussing the implications for policy and practice, while also considering the impact of recent developments like the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of non-public actors.

Urban Treatment Infrastructure in Pomorskie

The Pomorskie region's urban centers, particularly the Tri-City metropolitan area (Gdańsk, Gdynia, Sopot), host a more developed addiction treatment infrastructure compared to rural peripheries. This concentration reflects population density, historical healthcare development, and the location of specialized medical universities (Fortney et al., 2016). The Medical University of Gdańsk and its associated University Clinical Centre play significant roles in providing specialized care and training addiction specialists (UCK, n.d.).

Urban facilities in Pomorskie typically include inpatient detoxification units providing critical medical supervision for safe withdrawal management. These services represent an essential first step for many individuals seeking recovery (American Addiction Centers, 2024). The cornerstone of Poland's addiction treatment system—outpatient addiction clinics (Poradnie Terapii Uzależnień)—are more numerous in urban areas, offering individual and group therapy, psychoeducation, and relapse prevention planning with NFZ funding (EMCDDA, 2023b).

Day treatment programs (Oddziały Dzienne) offer intensive, structured therapy without overnight stays, serving as a step-down from inpatient care or an alternative for those with stable housing (National Institute on Drug Abuse [NIDA], 2020). Long-term residential rehabilitation centers provide immersive therapeutic environments for individuals requiring extended, structured support—a treatment modality with strong traditions in Poland, often operated by both NGOs and public entities (EMCDDA, 2023b).

While precise current numbers for Pomorskie require direct regional data, urban areas like the Tri-City typically maintain shorter wait times for non-emergency outpatient services compared to rural areas. However, actual wait times vary based on demand and NFZ contract levels. The concentration of certified addiction specialists and therapists is markedly higher in urban areas, though achieving optimal specialist-to-patient ratios remains a nationwide challenge (Wojnar & Wnuk, 2018).

Urban addiction services offer a broader range of evidence-based practices, including Medication-Assisted Treatment for opioid and alcohol dependence, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and motivational interviewing (NIDA, 2020). The EMCDDA (2023b) notes that opioid agonist treatment is available in Poland, primarily in larger cities. Proximity to academic institutions fosters research and innovation in treatment approaches. Furthermore, urban areas have better infrastructure for harm reduction services, although Poland's harm reduction landscape has faced persistent challenges and funding inconsistencies (EMCDDA, 2023b).

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly transformed service delivery across Poland's addiction treatment landscape. While initially disruptive, it accelerated the adoption of telehealth services, including remote counseling and consultations (Samochowiec et al., 2020). Urban centers, with superior digital infrastructure and higher concentrations of specialists, were better positioned to implement and sustain these remote services. However, policy considerations must address equitable access to telehealth for all populations, including those with digital literacy challenges or limited technology access (World Health Organization [WHO], 2022).

Services for behavioral addictions such as gambling and internet addiction are predominantly located in urban centers, often integrated into existing addiction clinics or provided by specialized NGOs (KBPN, 2020). Policy development and funding for these services typically lag behind those for substance use disorders, creating a critical gap in the treatment continuum that requires strategic attention.

Rural Treatment Landscape in Pomorskie

In contrast to urban centers, rural areas of Pomorskie face significant limitations in addiction treatment resources. This urban-rural disparity represents a well-documented phenomenon driven by factors such as lower population density, workforce shortages, and transportation barriers (Pullen & Oser, 2014; Hendryx et al., 2020). The treatment landscape in these rural areas is characterized by significant service gaps that demand policy intervention.

Rural communities typically have limited or no dedicated inpatient detoxification units, forcing individuals to travel to urban centers for medically supervised withdrawal. Rather than comprehensive clinics, rural areas often have only outpatient addiction "points" with limited hours, minimal staffing (such as visiting therapists available only once or twice weekly), and a narrower range of services compared to urban facilities (Pullen & Oser, 2014). The scarcity or complete absence of day treatment programs and specialized long-term residential facilities forces rural residents to relocate or undertake extensive travel for such care.

These service limitations create substantial barriers to treatment access. Wait times for initial assessments in rural areas can extend to several months—a critical delay when motivation for treatment is often transient and time-sensitive (Proctor et al., 2017). The specialist-to-patient ratio in rural Pomorskie is significantly lower, with fewer certified addiction specialists and therapists choosing to practice outside major urban areas (Wojnar & Wnuk, 2018). This mirrors findings from other countries where rural areas struggle with healthcare workforce shortages (Association of American Medical Colleges, 2023; Mohr et al., 2024). The "lack of institutional support" reported by physicians reluctant to treat addiction (National Institutes of Health [NIH], 2024) is exacerbated in smaller, under-resourced rural healthcare settings.

Travel distances of 50-120 kilometers for accessing specialized care in larger, more sparsely populated areas impose substantial costs related to transportation, time off work, and childcare (Pullen & Oser, 2014). While rural communities possess unique strengths, such as stronger informal social support networks and community cohesion (Smith & Weisner, 2000), these cannot fully compensate for the lack of formal, specialized treatment services. Policy interventions must recognize and build upon these community assets while addressing critical service gaps.

Addressing rural disparities requires targeted policy interventions, some of which are being explored or implemented in Poland and elsewhere. The expansion of telehealth services represents a promising approach, leveraging post-pandemic momentum to connect rural patients with urban-based specialists for counseling and consultations (Lin et al., 2021). Poland's national e-health strategy could provide a framework for systematic implementation (Centrum e-Zdrowia, n.d.).

Integration with primary care offers another viable policy direction. Training and supporting primary care physicians (lekarze POZ) in rural areas to screen, provide brief interventions, and manage less complex addiction cases, including prescribing certain MAT medications, could significantly increase access (NIDA, 2020). Policy must address barriers to integration such as time constraints and the need for specialist backup (NIH, 2024).

Mobile treatment units, while less common in Poland for addiction compared to some other countries, could bring services directly to remote communities as part of a comprehensive regional strategy. Workforce development initiatives, including incentives for addiction specialists to practice in underserved rural areas, potentially supported by EU structural funds or national programs, represent another critical policy lever (State of New Jersey Department of Human Services, n.d.).

Strengthening NGO and community-based support is essential, as these organizations often play a crucial role in reaching underserved populations. Supporting their capacity in rural areas through targeted funding and technical assistance should be a policy priority (EMCDDA, 2023b). Targeted funding through NFZ and EU Funds must prioritize investment in rural addiction treatment infrastructure. EU funds (e.g., European Social Fund Plus) have been used in Poland for health and social inclusion projects and could be further leveraged for addiction services (European Commission, n.d.).

The private sector for addiction treatment in Poland, while present, is more concentrated in urban areas and often involves out-of-pocket payments, potentially limiting access for rural populations with lower socioeconomic status (Wojnar & Wnuk, 2018). Policy considerations should include mechanisms to increase affordability and accessibility of private services in underserved areas, potentially through public-private partnerships or targeted subsidies.

Patient perspectives, gathered through systematic surveys or qualitative research, are crucial for understanding the lived experiences of accessing care in both urban and rural Pomorskie and should inform service planning and policy development (Galea & Stuber, 2006). Policy frameworks should institutionalize mechanisms for incorporating these perspectives into planning processes.

While urban centers in Pomorskie offer a relatively more comprehensive suite of addiction services, significant challenges exist in ensuring equitable access, quality, and comprehensiveness of care, especially for residents in rural and remote areas. Addressing these disparities requires a multi-pronged policy approach involving national policy reform, targeted regional strategies, adequate NFZ funding, leveraging EU opportunities, workforce development, and the integration of innovative service delivery models like telehealth, all while considering the specific cultural and socio-economic context of Poland.

Effective policy must recognize addiction as a chronic health condition requiring long-term, coordinated care across the treatment continuum. This necessitates moving beyond fragmented interventions toward integrated systems of care that address prevention, early intervention, treatment, and recovery support. Further research based on up-to-date, region-specific data from Polish health authorities is essential for precise understanding and effective policy response to the addiction treatment needs of Pomorskie's diverse population.

Key Barriers to Addiction Treatment in Rural Pomorskie

Access to effective addiction treatment is a critical component of public health, yet individuals in rural regions often face a distinct set of obstacles that impede their journey to recovery. In the Pomorskie Voivodeship of Poland, these challenges create significant disparities in care compared to urban areas. This analysis explores the key barriers to addiction treatment in rural Pomorskie, focusing on transportation challenges, workforce shortages, and stigma-related obstacles, while offering evidence-based policy recommendations to address these issues.

Recent national and European data underscore the urgent need for robust addiction services throughout Poland. The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA, 2023a) has documented persistent challenges with substance use disorders across Europe, with alcohol remaining the most commonly reported substance for specialized treatment entry in Poland, followed by amphetamines and cannabis. While rural Pomorskie-specific addiction prevalence data is limited in comprehensive public reports, national trends suggest that rural areas face particular vulnerabilities due to structural and social barriers (Krajowe Biuro ds. Przeciwdziałania Narkomanii [KBPN], 2021). Effective policy must address the unique context of rural communities to ensure equitable access to care within Poland's broader national health and addiction frameworks.

Transportation and Geographic Barriers: Bridging the Distance Divide

The geographic dispersion of rural communities in Pomorskie creates fundamental challenges for addiction treatment access. The combination of vast distances and inadequate public transportation infrastructure transforms attending treatment sessions into significant logistical and financial burdens for many residents. This geographic isolation represents not merely an inconvenience but a formidable barrier to consistent care engagement.

While rural Pomorskie-specific transportation statistics are limited, broader research consistently highlights transportation as a major impediment to addiction treatment globally. Pullen and Oser (2014) identified transportation as a predominant theme among counselor-identified barriers to effective substance abuse treatment in rural areas. For individuals with substance use disorders who may face economic hardship, co-occurring mental health conditions, and potential loss of driving privileges, these transportation limitations can render treatment effectively inaccessible (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA], 2022a).

The financial strain of securing private transportation, when available, diverts limited resources from other essential needs, further complicating recovery efforts. Missed appointments due to transportation challenges lead to fragmented care, increased relapse risk, and poorer overall treatment outcomes (Fortney et al., 1999; SAMHSA, 2022a). This creates a troubling cycle where those most in need of consistent care face the greatest barriers to accessing it.

Policy solutions must be multifaceted and tailored to local contexts. Transportation vouchers, partnerships with ride-sharing services, and mobile treatment units that bring services directly to rural communities have shown promise in other regions (National Center for Mobility Management, 2019; SAMHSA, 2022a). The increasing viability of telehealth services, particularly for counseling and follow-up care, can mitigate some transportation needs (Shore, 2013). Poland's expansion in telehealth, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic (Ministry of Health Poland, 2021), offers a foundation to build upon, though this requires addressing digital infrastructure gaps in rural areas where internet penetration often lags behind urban centers (GUS, 2022).

Effective implementation of transportation solutions in Pomorskie requires strategic investment, cross-sector collaboration, and integration with National Health Fund (NFZ) reimbursement mechanisms. Policymakers should consider establishing dedicated funding streams for rural transportation assistance programs and incentivizing providers to offer mobile or satellite services in underserved areas. Such initiatives would represent a critical step toward geographic equity in addiction treatment access.

Workforce Shortages and Distribution: Addressing the Professional Gap

The shortage and maldistribution of qualified addiction specialists in rural areas represent another critical barrier to accessing timely and appropriate care in Pomorskie. This issue reflects a broader challenge within the Polish healthcare system that requires targeted policy intervention.

While precise ratios of addiction specialists comparing rural and urban Pomorskie are not readily available in recent public reports, national data from Poland suggests a general maldistribution of medical specialists, including those in psychiatry and addiction, heavily favoring urban centers (Naczelna Izba Lekarska, 2022; KBPN, 2021). This workforce maldistribution is a well-documented global phenomenon in healthcare (World Health Organization [WHO], 2010) that creates significant treatment gaps in rural communities.

The factors driving this maldistribution are complex but addressable through policy. Lower compensation in rural facilities, professional isolation, limited career advancement opportunities, and quality of life considerations for practitioners and their families all contribute to difficulties in staffing rural addiction treatment facilities (Gale & Hawley, 2017). Professional organizations globally, such as the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM, n.d.) and NAADAC, the Association for Addiction Professionals (n.d.), advocate for policies supporting the growth and equitable distribution of the addiction workforce—principles that can inform Polish policy approaches.

A comprehensive workforce development strategy for rural Pomorskie should include financial incentives such as loan repayment programs or enhanced remuneration for rural practitioners. Professional development support, including mentorship programs and funding for continuing education, can help mitigate professional isolation. Expanding training opportunities with a focus on rural healthcare needs could increase the likelihood of graduates serving these communities.

A significant policy opportunity exists in empowering general practitioners, with appropriate training and specialist support, to manage less complex addiction cases—particularly alcohol dependence, which is prevalent in Poland. This approach aligns with efforts to strengthen primary care in Poland (Ministry of Health Poland, 2021) and could substantially expand treatment capacity in rural settings where primary care is often more accessible than specialty care.

Furthermore, telehealth models can extend the reach of urban-based specialists to rural patients and provide consultation support to rural primary care providers (Shore, 2013). Investing in robust training programs for various addiction professionals, including certified addiction therapists, psychologists, social workers, and peer support specialists, is vital to creating a diverse and resilient workforce. Without addressing these workforce challenges through coordinated policy action, even well-intentioned treatment programs in rural Pomorskie will struggle to meet population needs.

Stigma and Social Barriers: Changing Hearts and Minds

Beyond tangible challenges, the powerful force of stigma creates significant social barriers to addiction treatment in rural Pomorskie. The close-knit nature of rural communities, while often a source of social support, can foster an environment where privacy is limited and social judgment can be particularly acute (Pillion, 2020).

While specific ethnographic data on addiction stigma in rural Pomorskie is limited, general sociological research indicates that stigma associated with mental health and substance use remains a significant concern in Poland (CBOS, 2019). Fear of social ostracism, damage to family reputation, or employment consequences can deter individuals from seeking help, especially in smaller communities where anonymity is scarce. The perception of addiction as a moral failing rather than a treatable medical condition, a common driver of stigma globally (Volkow et al., 2021), leads to internalized shame and externalized discrimination that directly impedes treatment engagement.

The reluctance of some primary care physicians to engage directly with addiction issues represents a critical concern, as primary care is often the first and most accessible point of contact in rural areas. This reluctance may stem from inadequate specialized training, perceived resource limitations, time constraints, or personal biases, ultimately limiting opportunities for early intervention and referral (SAMHSA, 2022b).

Addressing addiction-related stigma requires comprehensive, multi-level policy strategies. Public awareness campaigns tailored to rural contexts, emphasizing that addiction is a health condition and that recovery is possible, can help shift societal attitudes. Such campaigns, ideally supported by national bodies like the KBPN and implemented with local community involvement, enhance credibility and cultural relevance. Scotland's "See Me" campaign, focused on mental health stigma, provides a model for national anti-stigma efforts that could be adapted to the Polish context (See Me Scotland, n.d.).

Policy should also promote the integration of addiction treatment with general healthcare services, rather than solely relying on standalone specialized clinics. This approach can help normalize addiction treatment and reduce perceived shame, aligning with collaborative care models where mental health and addiction specialists work alongside primary care providers (Archer et al., 2012). Ensuring strict confidentiality protocols within all healthcare settings is paramount to building trust in treatment systems.

The strategic deployment of peer support specialists—individuals in recovery trained to support others—can be invaluable in rural communities where they can offer empathetic understanding and challenge stigmatizing beliefs (SAMHSA, 2017). Policy should support the formal recognition, training, and integration of peer support specialists within treatment systems, creating career pathways that value lived experience alongside professional credentials.

Reducing stigma in rural Pomorskie necessitates a long-term policy commitment to education, community engagement, and regulatory changes that promote understanding, protect individuals from discrimination, and foster an environment where seeking help for addiction is viewed positively. Without addressing these deeply ingrained social barriers, efforts to improve transportation and workforce availability will not achieve their full potential.

Policy Context and Strategic Recommendations

Addressing addiction in Poland falls under a national framework, with institutions like the Krajowe Biuro ds. Przeciwdziałania Narkomanii playing a key role in coordinating efforts related to drug demand and supply reduction, prevention, treatment, and research (KBPN, n.d.). Funding for addiction treatment is primarily channeled through the National Health Fund (NFZ), which contracts services from various providers. Ensuring equitable resource allocation from the NFZ to address the specific needs of rural areas like Pomorskie is crucial for sustainable improvement.

A comprehensive policy strategy for rural Pomorskie should consider substance-specific approaches tailored to the predominant substances of misuse in the region. National data indicates alcohol dependence remains a major public health issue in Poland (WHO, 2019), suggesting the need for robust alcohol-specific interventions alongside approaches addressing other substances. The high rates of co-occurring mental health conditions among individuals with substance use disorders necessitate integrated treatment approaches that address the full spectrum of needs (Linas et al., 2020).

Prevention and harm reduction must complement treatment expansion in a balanced policy portfolio. Robust prevention programs targeting youth and vulnerable populations, as well as harm reduction services such as needle exchange programs and opioid substitution therapy where appropriate, are vital components of a comprehensive addiction strategy (EMCDDA, 2023b). These approaches should be tailored to rural contexts and integrated with existing community structures.

Digital solutions offer significant promise but require thoughtful implementation. While telehealth can extend specialist reach, addressing the digital divide in terms of access to technology and digital literacy in rural areas is critical for equitable implementation (GUS, 2022). Policy should support infrastructure development and digital literacy initiatives alongside telehealth expansion.

Future policy development should be informed by rigorous research specific to rural Pomorskie, quantifying barriers more precisely and evaluating intervention effectiveness. Engaging multiple stakeholders, including individuals with lived experience, healthcare providers, local policymakers, and community leaders from rural Pomorskie, will be essential for developing and implementing effective and culturally appropriate solutions.

In conclusion, addressing the barriers to addiction treatment in rural Pomorskie requires a coordinated, multi-level policy approach that tackles transportation challenges, workforce shortages, and pervasive stigma. By implementing evidence-based strategies tailored to the unique context of rural communities, policymakers can significantly improve treatment access and outcomes, ultimately reducing the burden of addiction and its associated harms in this region. The path forward demands sustained commitment, adequate resources, and a willingness to innovate—but the potential benefits for public health and community wellbeing make this investment essential.

Comparative Analysis of International Rural Addiction Treatment Models

Addressing addiction in rural communities presents unique challenges, including geographical isolation, limited infrastructure, workforce shortages, and higher levels of stigma (Pullen & Oser, 2014; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA], 2020a). However, various international models have demonstrated innovative and effective strategies to overcome these barriers. Recent data continue to underscore the significant need for these specialized approaches. In the United States, drug overdose death rates remain higher in rural counties compared to urban counties (Hedegaard et al., 2023). Globally, while urban centers often have a concentration of services, rural populations frequently experience a disparity in access to evidence-based addiction treatment (World Health Organization [WHO], 2022a).

Telemedicine and Digital Health Interventions

Technology offers a powerful tool to bridge the distance between rural individuals needing addiction treatment and qualified providers. Several international models demonstrate promising approaches to overcoming geographic barriers through technology, particularly accelerated by adaptations during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Estonia's Digital Health Initiative provides a relevant example of comprehensive digital infrastructure. Estonia has been a pioneer in digital governance and health, with a nationwide e-Health system featuring centralized digital health records, e-prescriptions, and a secure platform for health information exchange (e-Estonia, n.d.; European Commission, 2022). The established infrastructure supports enhanced access to remote consultations, prescription management, and therapy sessions for all citizens, including those in rural areas (Rooväli et al., 2017). The success of such systems relies on high digital literacy and robust internet infrastructure, which Estonia has actively developed (European Commission, 2022).

Similarly, Scotland's National Health Service (NHS) has utilized telehealth to extend services to remote and rural areas, including the Highlands and Islands. NHS Near Me, a video consulting service, saw massively increased uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic for various health services, including mental health and substance use support (NHS Scotland, 2021). Studies have consistently shown that telehealth initiatives in Scotland improve access, reduce travel burdens for patients in remote areas, and receive positive patient and provider satisfaction (Scottish Government, 2021; Wilson et al., 2022).

In the United States, telemedicine has been crucial for expanding access to Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD), particularly buprenorphine, in rural settings. Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of telemedicine for delivering buprenorphine treatment. A study evaluating a program at a rural drug treatment center found that treatment with buprenorphine through telemedicine was a viable and effective option (Weintraub et al., 2018). Furthermore, a University of Maryland School of Medicine study found that a mobile telemedicine unit was as effective as traditional brick-and-mortar clinics in treating opioid addiction in rural areas, offering comparable retention rates and clinical outcomes (Brodey et al., 2021; University of Maryland School of Medicine, 2021). Policies enacted during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) that allowed for telehealth initiation of buprenorphine without an initial in-person visit significantly expanded access, particularly in rural areas where opioid treatment program (OTP) access is limited (SAMHSA, 2021a; Jones et al., 2022). The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and SAMHSA have since issued rules to extend some of these flexibilities, with ongoing discussions about permanent adoption and the balance between access and diversion concerns (DEA, 2023; SAMHSA, 2024a).

Canada has also leveraged telemedicine to address addiction in its vast rural and remote territories. The British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (BCCSU) provides clinical guidance supporting virtual OUD diagnosis and treatment, which became especially critical during the pandemic and continues to be relevant (BCCSU, 2022). Programs connecting specialists with primary care providers in rural areas for consultation and co-management of addiction cases via telehealth, such as those facilitated through university networks, have improved local capacity (Yukon Health and Social Services, 2021).

Despite the promise of telehealth, implementing telemedicine for rural addiction treatment internationally faces several challenges. The digital divide remains a significant barrier, with persistent disparities in reliable, affordable internet access and digital literacy among some rural populations (Heitkamp et al., 2019; Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology [ONC], 2023). Regulatory and reimbursement barriers also pose challenges. While significantly eased during COVID-19, varying cross-jurisdictional licensing laws and evolving reimbursement policies for telehealth services still pose challenges for sustained, equitable adoption (Lin et al., 2021; American Medical Association [AMA], 2023). Privacy and security concerns are paramount, especially in small, close-knit rural communities where privacy concerns can be heightened (WHO, 2022b). Additionally, telemedicine may not be suitable for all individuals, particularly those with severe co-occurring conditions, unstable housing, or lacking a safe, private space for consultations (Abrams et al., 2022).

Mobile Treatment Units and Hub-and-Spoke Models

Integrating services and bringing care directly to communities are key strategies for rural addiction treatment. Vermont's "Hub-and-Spoke" model in the United States offers a well-documented insight into effective regional organization of MOUD services. This model consists of specialized addiction treatment centers ("Hubs") providing comprehensive services, including MAT initiation and management for complex cases, and supporting community-based providers ("Spokes"), typically primary care physicians or outpatient clinics, who deliver ongoing MAT and recovery support (Blueprint for Health, n.d.; Brooklyn & Sigmon, 2017). Rural primary care physicians in the Spokes receive specialized training, ongoing consultation from Hub specialists, and clear referral pathways, enabling them to manage less complex OUD cases locally (Brooklyn & Sigmon, 2017).

Implementation in Vermont resulted in a significant increase in the availability and utilization of MOUD. Statewide buprenorphine dispensing increased by over 800% between 2009 and 2016 (Vermont Department of Health, 2017). The model has also been associated with reductions in opioid-related overdose deaths in the state (Brooklyn & Sigmon, 2017). The model demonstrated cost-effectiveness. A study by the Parthenon Group (as cited in Vermont Department of Health, 2017, p. 38) estimated that for every dollar (USD) Vermont invested in treatment through the Hub and Spoke system, it saw a return of $3.12 in reduced healthcare costs and criminal justice expenses.

Finland's use of mobile health clinics for various services in sparsely populated areas demonstrates a model adaptable for addiction treatment. Mobile health clinics internationally are a recognized strategy for improving access to various health services, including mental health and harm reduction, in underserved rural areas (Zur et al., 2018; WHO, 2022c). These units can reduce transportation barriers and stigma by bringing services like assessment, counseling, needle exchange, and potentially medication management to familiar local settings.

In Canada, some provinces have implemented or piloted mobile outreach services. Mobile supervised consumption services and drug-checking units have been deployed, primarily in urban centers, but the principles are adaptable for rural outreach to provide harm reduction and treatment linkage (Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, 2019; Strike et al., 2020). Some regions also use mobile units for broader health outreach that can include substance use screening and referrals.

Australia has also explored outreach models. The Royal Flying Doctor Service provides a range of health services, including mental health and drug and alcohol support, to remote and rural communities, sometimes utilizing mobile clinics or fly-in fly-out services (Royal Flying Doctor Service, n.d.). Additionally, some states have funded mobile units for specific purposes like youth mental health and substance use support in regional areas.

These models face several challenges, including sustainability and funding. Securing long-term, stable funding for mobile units and the coordination required for hub-and-spoke models can be challenging, especially in areas with limited resources (Zur et al., 2018). Staffing is another significant challenge, as recruiting and retaining qualified staff willing to work in mobile settings or rural spoke locations can be difficult. Ensuring seamless integration and care coordination between mobile units/spokes and more specialized hubs, hospitals, or social services is crucial for a continuum of care and can be logistically complex (SAMHSA, 2022a). Additionally, mobile units may be limited in the intensity or range of services they can provide compared to fixed-site clinics.

Workforce Development and Incentive Programs

A skilled and stable workforce is the backbone of any effective addiction treatment system, yet rural areas globally face chronic shortages of addiction specialists, mental health professionals, and primary care physicians trained in addiction medicine (SAMHSA, 2020a).

Australia's comprehensive approach to addressing health workforce maldistribution serves as an example. Australia has numerous government and state-level initiatives aimed at improving rural health workforce supply and retention, such as the Stronger Rural Health Strategy and various Rural Health Training Hubs (Australian Government Department of Health, n.d.-a). These programs often combine financial incentives (e.g., scholarships, relocation grants), investments in rural training pipelines, and professional support networks. For example, the Health Workforce Scholarship Program (HWSP) offers scholarships and bursaries to help health professionals in rural and remote areas upskill in areas of need, including addiction medicine (Australian Government Department of Health, n.d.-b). Evaluations of specific programs or regional initiatives often show positive impacts on recruitment and retention for various health professions in rural areas (Access Economics, 2008; Humphreys et al., 2015). The focus is on a multi-pronged strategy rather than a single program.

In the United States, states like Oregon have implemented incentive programs. Oregon's Health Care Provider Incentive Program includes loan forgiveness, scholarships, and other incentives focused on workforce development in underserved areas, including rural regions, and aims to develop a culturally responsive workforce (Oregon Health Authority, n.d.-a; Oregon Health Authority, n.d.-b). The National Health Service Corps (NHSC) offers scholarships and loan repayment to healthcare providers, including substance use disorder counselors, who commit to working in Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), many of which are rural (Health Resources & Services Administration [HRSA], n.d.). Studies show NHSC programs improve recruitment to underserved areas, though long-term retention after service completion can vary (Pathman et al., 2004; HRSA, 2021). Training initiatives like the Providers Clinical Support System (PCSS) offer free, evidence-based training and mentoring to health professionals to encourage MOUD prescribing, which is critical for rural areas (PCSS, n.d.).

Norway ensures equitable healthcare access, including addiction services, in its geographically challenging rural and remote northern regions through state-regulated specialist services, strong municipal primary care responsibilities, and financial incentives (e.g., salary bonuses, continuing education funding) for health professionals working in these areas (Norwegian Directorate of Health, 2021; WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2018).

Key components of successful workforce development programs often include targeted recruitment of individuals with rural backgrounds or a strong interest in rural practice. Rural-specific training that integrates rural health experiences and addiction treatment training into undergraduate and postgraduate curricula, including training in MOUD and behavioral therapies, is also essential (SAMHSA, 2024b; American Addiction Centers, 2024). Financial incentives such as loan repayment, scholarships, competitive salaries, and housing assistance are critical, as are professional support through mentorship programs, peer support networks, and access to specialist consultation. Expanding the scope of practice to allow nurses, physician assistants, and other allied health professionals to play a greater role in addiction care under appropriate supervision and training can alleviate physician shortages (Phoenix & Leff, 2021). Cultural competency training is also essential to equip providers to deliver culturally sensitive and appropriate care for diverse rural populations, including Indigenous communities.

Expanding Comprehensiveness in Rural Addiction Treatment

Beyond the core models discussed, a truly comprehensive approach to rural addiction treatment must incorporate several other critical elements. In countries like Australia, Canada, and the United States, rural areas are often home to significant Indigenous populations who experience disproportionate rates of substance use disorders due to historical trauma, colonization, and systemic inequities (Allan & Smylie, 2015; National Aboriginal Health Organization, 2012; SAMHSA, 2020b). Effective treatment must be culturally responsive, incorporating traditional healing practices, involving community elders, and addressing social determinants of health. Models that are community-led or co-designed with Indigenous communities show greater promise (Gone & Trimble, 2012). For example, the Thunderbird Partnership Foundation in Canada supports First Nations mental wellness initiatives, emphasizing culturally grounded approaches (Thunderbird Partnership Foundation, n.d.).

Harm reduction strategies are vital components of a comprehensive addiction response, aiming to reduce the negative consequences of substance use. In rural areas, this can include naloxone distribution programs that train and equip first responders, community members, and individuals who use drugs with naloxone to reverse opioid overdoses (Davis & Carr, 2017). Syringe services programs (SSPs) provide sterile injection equipment, safe disposal, and linkage to testing, treatment, and other health services. Mobile SSPs can be particularly effective in rural regions (Islam et al., 2018). Drug checking services allow individuals to have their substances tested for content and potency, which can inform safer use practices and alert communities to dangerous adulterants like fentanyl (Maghsoudi et al., 2022). Access to these services in rural areas is often limited but critically needed.

In many rural communities, community-based organizations (CBOs), faith-based organizations, and peer support specialists play a crucial role in addiction prevention, treatment, and recovery (SAMHSA, 2020a). CBOs can offer localized services, outreach, and support that are trusted by the community. Faith communities can provide spiritual support, recovery groups, and practical assistance, though it's important to ensure approaches are non-judgmental and evidence-informed. Peer support specialists, individuals with lived experience of recovery, can offer invaluable empathy, navigation assistance, and hope. Their integration into formal treatment teams is growing and shows positive impacts on engagement and retention (Bassuk et al., 2016; SAMHSA, 2023a).

Individuals with substance use disorders are overrepresented in the criminal justice system, and this intersection is particularly acute in rural areas where treatment alternatives to incarceration may be scarce (National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics, 2019). Diversion programs that offer pre- or post-arrest diversion to treatment instead of jail can improve outcomes and reduce recidivism. Drug courts provide specialized dockets that combine judicial oversight with treatment and recovery support services. Providing MOUD in correctional settings and ensuring continuity of care upon release is critical for reducing post-release overdose deaths (SAMHSA, 2023b). Access to MAT in rural jails often lags behind urban counterparts.

While the opioid crisis has garnered significant attention, rural communities also face challenges with other substances. Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) remains highly prevalent in many rural areas, with significant health and social consequences. Access to evidence-based treatments like naltrexone, acamprosate, and behavioral therapies needs strengthening (SAMHSA, 2022b). Rural areas have seen significant increases in methamphetamine use. Effective responses include contingency management, behavioral therapies, and community-based recovery supports, though evidence-based medications are still limited for stimulant use disorder (Shoptaw et al., 2020).

Current Challenges and Ethical Considerations in Rural Addiction Policy

Implementing effective addiction treatment in rural settings involves navigating persistent challenges and complex ethical considerations. Higher levels of stigma in close-knit rural communities can deter individuals from seeking treatment and make it difficult to recruit and retain addiction professionals (Pullen & Oser, 2014). Anonymity is harder to maintain, increasing privacy concerns. Rural services often face greater financial precarity due to smaller populations, limited economies of scale, and reliance on grant funding. Consistent, adequate, and flexible funding for innovative models is crucial (Panchal et al., 2021).

Lack of granular, localized data on addiction prevalence, treatment needs, and outcomes specifically for diverse rural populations hinders targeted policy development, resource allocation, and evaluation (WHO, 2022a). High rates of co-occurring mental health conditions with substance use disorders in rural areas necessitate integrated treatment approaches. This requires a workforce trained in dual diagnosis and collaborative care models, which are often scarce (Mojtabai et al., 2014; SAMHSA, 2020a).

Beyond digital infrastructure, limited public transportation, affordable housing shortages, and lack of childcare can be significant barriers to accessing and remaining in treatment in rural settings (Lenardson et al., 2016). The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated existing challenges, including increased substance use, mental health issues, and disruptions to services, while also accelerating innovations like telehealth (Khatri & Perrone, 2022; SAMHSA, 2021b). Sustaining beneficial adaptations while addressing new disparities is key.

Ethical considerations in rural addiction treatment include privacy and confidentiality concerns. In small communities where "everyone knows everyone," protecting patient privacy is paramount and requires robust policies and staff training (Richards et al., 2019). Ensuring truly informed consent and voluntary participation, especially when treatment is linked to social services or the justice system, is essential. Designing services that are accessible to all residents, regardless of socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, or specific needs, and actively addressing barriers faced by marginalized groups is crucial for equitable access. Balancing the need to implement evidence-based practices with fidelity against the necessity of adapting models to fit unique local cultural contexts and resource availability is an ongoing challenge (Aarons et al., 2011). Patient and community engagement in co-designing and evaluating services is critical for relevance and success.

While significant challenges persist, international experiences with telemedicine, integrated care models like hub-and-spoke systems and mobile units, comprehensive workforce development strategies, and culturally attuned approaches offer valuable blueprints for improving addiction treatment access and outcomes in rural communities. No single model is a panacea; rather, a combination of these strategies, tailored to specific local contexts, supported by robust and flexible policy and funding, and continuously evaluated for effectiveness and equity, is essential. Addressing the multifaceted needs of rural populations affected by addiction requires a commitment to innovation, collaboration, community engagement, and a sustained focus on reducing disparities in care.

Policy Recommendations for Addressing Addiction in the Pomorskie Region

This chapter presents a comprehensive framework for addressing addiction challenges in the Pomorskie Region through evidence-based policy interventions. Drawing upon current research, international best practices, and proven approaches, these recommendations are structured as a progressive implementation strategy spanning short-term interventions, medium-term strategies, and long-term system transformations. A critical consideration throughout is the necessity of adapting international models to Poland's specific socio-cultural, economic, and healthcare context, ensuring alignment with the National Health Fund (Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia - NFZ) and relevant Polish legislation.

Short-Term Interventions (1-2 Years)

Telemedicine Implementation Program

Telemedicine has emerged as a vital tool for expanding access to addiction services, particularly in underserved rural areas. It effectively mitigates geographical barriers, reduces stigma, and enhances patient privacy (Shore, 2013; Telehealth.HHS.gov, 2023). The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated adoption and demonstrated the feasibility of telehealth for various aspects of substance use disorder (SUD) care, including assessments, therapy, and medication management (SAMHSA, 2021a; Ochal et al., 2021).

To implement an effective telemedicine network for addiction services in Pomorskie, approximately €2.0 million should be allocated from the Regional Health Fund and/or EU structural funds for technology infrastructure and training. This investment would support secure, high-speed internet connectivity for rural clinics, GDPR-compliant video conferencing platforms, and necessary hardware. A thorough needs assessment should precede allocation, examining digital infrastructure gaps and patient/provider readiness. Experience from other European rural areas highlights the importance of co-funding models and public-private partnerships (Bacigalupe et al., 2021).

The development of standardized, culturally adapted protocols for remote assessment, consultation, and therapy is essential. These protocols must be evidence-based, translated, and culturally adapted for the Pomorskie region, ensuring patient safety, confidentiality, and quality of care while aligning with Polish and EU data protection regulations. They should cover initial psychiatric evaluations, psychoeducational and therapy groups, and individual counseling sessions, drawing from established guidelines.

Training approximately 100-150 rural primary care providers and support staff in basic addiction screening and telemedicine facilitation will create a foundation for service delivery. This training should cover validated screening tools adapted for the Polish context, motivational interviewing, cultural competency, and technical aspects of telemedicine. Studies demonstrate that trained primary care providers can effectively use telehealth for SUDs (Lin et al., 2019a). Training should be ongoing and include peer support mechanisms.

Advocacy for reimbursement parity between in-person and telemedicine addiction services within the NFZ framework will be crucial for sustainability. Ensuring adequate reimbursement has been a challenge globally (Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, 2022), and experiences from other EU countries that have integrated telehealth reimbursement offer valuable lessons (European Commission, 2020).

With successful implementation, we can expect a 15-25% increase in rural patients accessing initial addiction assessment within two years. Telehealth effectively addresses geographical barriers (Rural Health Information Hub, 2023; Fortney et al., 2013), though specific outcomes will depend on local conditions and implementation quality. Additionally, we can anticipate a 10-20% reduction in early treatment discontinuation rates among telehealth users, as the convenience of telehealth may improve adherence (Lin et al., 2019a). Finally, a 10-15% decrease in emergency department visits for addiction-related crises among engaged patients is possible, as improved access to ongoing care via telehealth helps manage SUDs and reduce crises (Cole et al., 2019).

Transportation Assistance Initiative

Transportation barriers significantly impede healthcare access, especially for rural individuals and those with SUDs (Syed et al., 2013; Priester et al., 2016). This is a recognized issue in many parts of Europe, including Poland (EuroHealthNet, 2018). Establishing a coordinated transportation support system for rural patients requiring addiction treatment is therefore essential.

An estimated €1.2 million should be allocated for a flexible transport fund to support various solutions: contracting with local transport providers, subsidizing fuel for volunteers or family members, or purchasing a small fleet of multi-purpose vehicles for targeted routes based on needs analysis. Non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) models in the US (Bruen et al., 2016) and rural transport schemes in Europe offer diverse operational examples that can be adapted to Pomorskie's context.

Developing a coordination system between treatment facilities, patients, and transportation providers will maximize efficiency. This could take the form of a centralized booking system or a decentralized model with local coordinators managing requests. Collaboration with existing social service transport or PKS/local bus operators in Pomorskie should be explored to leverage existing infrastructure.

Clear eligibility assessment for transport support, considering income and accessibility needs, will ensure equitable distribution of resources. Support should be prioritized for those with demonstrable need, aligning with principles of social welfare support (Ku et al., 2011). Additionally, partnerships with regional/local public transportation authorities for subsidized passes or dedicated routes should be explored as a cost-effective solution for patients who can use public transport but find it unaffordable.

Implementation of this initiative can lead to a 20-30% reduction in missed appointments attributed to transportation barriers among beneficiaries. While Wallace et al. (2005) demonstrated that NEMT reduced missed appointments, the magnitude varies across contexts. We can also expect a 10-15% increase in treatment program completion rates among beneficiaries, as improved attendance supports consistent engagement, which is crucial for treatment completion (Beardsley et al., 2003). Furthermore, continuous treatment engagement, facilitated by reliable transportation, supports recovery and contributes to a reduction in relapse rates attributable to treatment interruption (Scott & Dennis, 2009).

Medium-Term Strategies (2-5 Years)

Rural Addiction Workforce Development Program

The shortage of qualified addiction specialists in rural regions is a widespread European challenge (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2019). Addressing this issue in Pomorskie requires a multi-faceted approach that considers Poland's specific healthcare workforce dynamics.

Establishing a regional scholarship and loan forgiveness program for addiction professionals committing to 3-5 years in designated rural areas of Pomorskie would create powerful incentives for workforce development. Loan repayment has proven effective in other contexts (NHSC, n.d.; Rourke, 2010), though the program should be tailored to Polish educational debt levels and career pathways. Complementing this, competitive salary supplements or bonuses for rural addiction specialists, funded through regional or national programs, can help offset disadvantages of rural practice (Patterson et al., 2017), though careful structuring within the Polish public sector salary framework is necessary.

Developing or enhancing existing addiction medicine training pathways with a strong rural practice component, possibly in collaboration with medical universities in Gdańsk or other Polish centers, will build long-term capacity. "Grow-your-own" strategies have demonstrated effectiveness (Quinn et al., 2011), and training should address specific rural challenges, including co-occurring disorders and limited resources. Models like Project ECHO could be adapted for ongoing learning and support (Arora et al., 2011).

Creating a professional support network for rural practitioners, linking them with urban centers of excellence and peers, will combat professional isolation. This network can offer mentorship, continuing education aligned with Polish medical education credit systems, peer support, and specialist consultation through the established telemedicine network.

With these interventions, we can target a 30-50% increase in the number of professionals with specialized addiction training practicing in designated rural areas of Pomorskie over five years. This represents a significant but achievable increase, given the time needed for training and recruitment (WHO, 2010). We can also expect gradual improvement in the specialist-to-patient ratio in rural areas, reducing disparities with urban centers, and a 20-30% decrease in average wait times for specialized addiction services in targeted rural areas as increased specialist numbers reduce waiting lists (Proctor & Huzzard, 2013).

Community-Based Treatment Expansion & Harm Reduction Integration

The hub-and-spoke model (Brooklyn & Sigmon, 2017) offers a promising framework for expanding medication-assisted treatment (MAT) access in Pomorskie. This model must be adapted to Polish regulations regarding prescribing and integrated with existing primary care and psychiatric services. Harm reduction represents a critical component of a comprehensive addiction strategy (EMCDDA, 2021).

Implementation begins with designating 2-3 existing regional addiction treatment centers as "hubs" providing comprehensive, complex care and specialist support. These hubs would offer MAT induction/stabilization, intensive psychosocial therapies, co-occurring disorder treatment, and crisis intervention while training and mentoring spoke providers.

Developing and supporting approximately 10-15 "spokes" in rural primary care facilities, community mental health centers, or dedicated addiction outpatient clinics will extend reach into communities. Spokes would provide ongoing MAT (as per Polish regulations, potentially with primary care provider involvement under specialist supervision), counseling, relapse prevention, and harm reduction services. Telehealth can link spokes to hub expertise (Weintraub et al., 2018).

Standardized referral protocols, care coordination agreements, and interoperable health information systems are vital for seamless patient care. Clear protocols and information sharing ensure continuity of care (Vermont Agency of Human Services, 2017), though this requires addressing data privacy (RODO) and technical interoperability within the Polish e-health landscape.

Training approximately 150-200 primary care providers and other relevant health professionals in evidence-based addiction interventions will build capacity throughout the system. Training should cover MAT options, behavioral therapies, and harm reduction strategies (SAMHSA, 2022a; EMCDDA, 2021). Integrating or co-locating harm reduction services within spokes, or establishing clear referral pathways to existing services, will provide comprehensive care. This includes expanding access to naloxone kits and training for individuals at risk, families, and first responders, and exploring the feasibility of needle and syringe programs where epidemiologically indicated.

With effective implementation, we can expect a 30-40% increase in rural patients receiving appropriate MAT and/or structured psychosocial treatment. The Vermont model significantly increased MAT access (Brooklyn & Sigmon, 2017), though local success depends on regulatory context and provider buy-in. We can also anticipate a 25-35% reduction in average distance traveled for routine addiction services for patients utilizing spokes, and a decrease in hospitalization rates for addiction-related complications and overdose deaths through enhanced community care and harm reduction, as community-based MAT and harm reduction are linked to reduced acute care and mortality (Volkow et al., 2014; Sordo et al., 2017).

Long-Term System Transformation (5-10 Years)

Integrated Rural Addiction Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery System

A holistic, long-term strategy addresses addiction as a chronic condition requiring a continuum of care, emphasizing health equity (WHO, n.d.). This comprehensive approach must be culturally attuned to Polish rural communities to achieve lasting impact.

Implementing evidence-based addiction prevention programs in rural schools and community settings, adapted for the Polish context, establishes a foundation for reducing substance use disorders. Programs like "Unplugged" (European Drug Addiction Prevention trial) or Iceland's "Planet Youth" model (Kristjansson et al., 2020) offer frameworks that can be adapted to local culture, prevalent substances, and family engagement patterns.

Integrating routine addiction screening (e.g., SBIRT model) into primary healthcare, mental health services, and potentially social services using validated tools adapted for Poland enables early identification and intervention. Early identification facilitates timely intervention (Babor et al., 2007; USPSTF, 2020), though this requires training and system changes within the NFZ framework.

Supporting the development of recovery community organizations (RCOs) and peer support services in rural counties/powiats creates sustainable recovery infrastructure. RCOs and peer support, led by individuals with lived experience, are vital for long-term recovery (White, 2009; SAMHSA, 2017). This involves training, potential certification pathways for peer workers, and sustainable funding models. Family support groups should also be fostered as essential components of the recovery ecosystem.

Creating pathways for individuals in recovery to become certified peer support specialists strengthens the addiction workforce while providing unique support, reducing stigma, and aiding individual recovery journeys. Polish regulations and training standards would need development or adaptation to support this workforce innovation.

Strengthening inter-agency collaboration between health, social services, education, law enforcement (focusing on diversion to treatment), and employment services at regional and local levels ensures a coordinated response to addiction challenges. This whole-of-government approach recognizes that addiction impacts multiple domains of life and requires coordinated intervention.

With sustained implementation, we can aim for a 10-15% reduction in the incidence of new SUDs among youth in areas with high-fidelity prevention programs. Prevention effects are typically long-term and depend on program quality and reach (Hawkins et al., 2008). We can also expect a 40-50% increase in early-stage intervention for SUDs through systematic screening and brief intervention, as SBIRT has shown effectiveness in increasing early interventions (Madras et al., 2009). Measurable improvement in long-term recovery rates and quality of life for individuals engaged with comprehensive recovery support systems is also anticipated, as robust recovery support is linked to better long-term outcomes (McKay, 2009; Best & Laudet, 2010). Ultimately, these interventions should contribute to reducing urban-rural disparities in addiction treatment access, quality, and outcomes within Pomorskie.

Implementation Challenges and Considerations

Implementing these recommendations in Pomorskie will require addressing several significant challenges. Funding sustainability represents a primary concern, as securing long-term NFZ funding and/or other stable sources beyond initial investments is critical. Demonstrating cost-effectiveness will be important for maintaining political and financial support (Pacula & Lundberg, 2014).

Workforce shortages and training needs present another substantial challenge. Addressing shortages of addiction specialists and training a broader healthcare workforce in Poland is a significant undertaking (Thomas et al., 2009; WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2019) that requires sustained commitment and investment.

Stigma against people with SUDs and certain treatments (e.g., MAT, harm reduction) persists in Poland, affecting help-seeking behavior and policy support (Livingston et al., 2012; Crapanzano et al., 2019). Public awareness campaigns and professional education will be needed to address these attitudes.

The regulatory and legislative context in Poland regarding MAT prescribing, telehealth reimbursement, data sharing, and the scope of practice for various professionals will need careful navigation and potential advocacy for reform to enable full implementation of these recommendations.

Robust local data systems are needed in Pomorskie to monitor prevalence, service utilization, and outcomes to guide policy implementation and refinement (EMCDDA, 2019). Without good data, it becomes difficult to demonstrate program effectiveness and make necessary adjustments.

Effective implementation requires strong, formalized collaboration between diverse ministries, regional (voivodeship), and local (powiat, gmina) authorities and NGOs, which can be complex to establish and maintain. Clear governance structures and communication channels will be essential.

International models must be carefully adapted to Pomorskie's specific cultural norms, linguistic needs, rural social structures, family dynamics, and the existing Polish healthcare and social welfare systems (Priester et al., 2016). The specific substance use patterns in Pomorskie must drive intervention priorities.

Finally, potential resistance from some healthcare providers or communities to new models of care needs to be anticipated and addressed through dialogue, training, and evidence dissemination. Change management strategies should be incorporated into implementation planning.

Proactive engagement with these challenges, strong political will, and involvement of diverse stakeholders, including people with lived experience and their families, will be crucial for successful implementation of these policy recommendations in the Pomorskie Region.

Implementation Considerations and Funding Mechanisms

Effective and sustainable addiction policy requires not only well-designed interventions but also robust frameworks for implementation and secure, diverse funding streams. This chapter outlines key considerations for putting policy into practice, focusing on multi-stakeholder coordination, sustainable financial models, ethical considerations, and the integration of comprehensive approaches including prevention, harm reduction, and treatment. It draws on international best practices, recent research, and evidence-based strategies, with a view to their applicability in the Pomorskie region.

Multi-Stakeholder Coordination Framework

The complex nature of substance use disorders (SUDs), intertwined with social, economic, and health factors, necessitates a coordinated response that transcends individual agency silos. As highlighted by the World Health Organization (WHO), effective responses to public health challenges like addiction depend on intersectoral action and collaboration (WHO, 2021a). Research consistently shows that fragmented systems of care lead to inefficiencies, gaps in service, and poorer patient outcomes (Health Foundation, 2022; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [NASEM], 2016).

We recommend establishing a Pomorskie Rural Addiction Treatment and Prevention Taskforce. This model aligns with successful collaborative approaches observed internationally. For instance, in the United States, many states and counties have established multi-agency task forces to address the opioid crisis, bringing together public health, law enforcement, behavioral health, and social services (National Governors Association, n.d., retrieved October 26, 2023). Similarly, the UK's drug strategy emphasizes local partnerships involving health, criminal justice, housing, and employment services (HM Government, 2021). The Warren County Community Services Board in New York highlights the importance of "collaboration, information sharing, and multi-stakeholder problem-solving" in addressing local needs, including addiction services (Washington County, n.d., retrieved October 26, 2023). New Jersey's Behavioral Health Integration (BHI) initiative also underscores the value of a "phased, multi-year approach involving robust stakeholder engagement" (NJ Department of Human Services, n.d., retrieved October 26, 2023).

Representation on such a taskforce is critical for comprehensive planning, buy-in, and ensuring diverse perspectives are integrated. The Regional Health Department should serve as the lead agency, providing strategic direction, ensuring alignment with regional health priorities, and managing overarching program implementation. Their leadership is crucial for accountability and resource mobilization. Municipal and county governments are essential for tailoring interventions to local contexts, addressing social determinants of health, and facilitating community engagement. Rural areas often face unique challenges, such as transportation barriers and limited anonymity, which local governments are best positioned to understand and mitigate (Pullen & Oser, 2014).

The National Health Fund should be involved to ensure alignment with national funding streams, reimbursement policies, and health system reforms. Their involvement is key for long-term sustainability, particularly in integrating services into standard care. Primary care provider associations are crucial given that primary care is often the first point of contact for individuals with SUDs, and sometimes the only accessible care in rural areas. Their involvement is essential for integrating screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT), as well as medication-assisted treatment (MAT) (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA], 2023a).

Addiction specialist organizations provide expert knowledge on evidence-based practices, treatment protocols, and workforce training needs. Organizations like the UVM Center on Rural Addiction (CORA) exemplify this by aiming to expand addiction-treatment capacity in rural counties through consultation, resources, and training for providers (UVM CORA, n.d., retrieved October 26, 2023). Patient advocacy groups and individuals with lived experience ensure that policies and services are patient-centered, address stigma, incorporate the lived experiences of individuals in recovery, and promote peer support services. Their involvement can improve service uptake, relevance, and co-production of effective solutions (National Institute on Drug Abuse [NIDA], 2020a; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA], 2017).

Academic institutions support evidence-based practice through research, program evaluation, and workforce development. They can also contribute to understanding local addiction trends and treatment outcomes. The complexities and crunched timelines often involved in large-scale addiction prevention and treatment implementation underscore the need for robust academic input in planning and evaluation (CU Anschutz Medical Campus, 2024). Social service agencies address co-occurring needs such as housing, employment, and family support, which are critical for sustained recovery (NIDA, 2020a). Law enforcement and criminal justice representatives facilitate collaboration on diversion programs, crisis response, and reducing the criminalization of addiction, aligning with public health approaches (Scott et al., 2021).

This taskforce should develop a detailed implementation timeline with clear, measurable objectives, assigned responsibilities, and quarterly progress reviews. Accountability mechanisms, such as public reporting or independent evaluations, are vital. A dedicated project management office within the Regional Health Department should be established to coordinate activities, manage communication, and track progress across stakeholders, ensuring that implementation stays on course despite potential challenges like those identified in rural settings, such as workforce shortages and confidentiality concerns (Pullen & Oser, 2014). Implementation of complex interventions like The ASAM Criteria requires such coordination across clinicians, payors, and policymakers (ASAM, n.d., retrieved October 26, 2023).

The taskforce's effectiveness should be monitored using specific metrics, including process metrics (number of individuals screened for SUDs, number of referrals to treatment, number of professionals trained, availability of MAT and harm reduction services), outcome metrics (treatment initiation and retention rates, changes in substance use patterns, overdose rates, improvements in client-reported quality of life and functioning, rates of co-occurring disorder treatment), and system metrics (wait times for services, integration of care across providers, cost-effectiveness of interventions). Regular evaluation reports should inform ongoing policy adjustments and resource allocation.

Impact of COVID-19 on Addiction and Treatment Services

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted substance use patterns and addiction treatment services globally and in Europe (European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction [EMCDDA], 2022a). Lockdowns, social isolation, economic distress, and increased anxiety contributed to rising rates of substance use and mental health disorders for some populations (Pfefferbaum & North, 2020; UNODC, 2021). Simultaneously, treatment services faced disruptions, including reduced capacity, staff shortages, and shifts in service delivery models. Many providers rapidly adopted or expanded telehealth services to maintain care continuity (SAMHSA, 2021a). This context underscores the need for resilient and adaptable addiction service systems, with robust telehealth infrastructure and crisis preparedness plans. Implementation planning must account for these pandemic-related shifts and potential long-term consequences on community needs and service delivery preferences.

Funding Sources and Sustainability

The effective implementation of comprehensive addiction services, particularly in underserved rural areas, requires significant and sustained investment. While the upfront costs can be substantial, the long-term societal benefits—including reduced healthcare expenditures, decreased crime rates, improved productivity, and enhanced social well-being—far outweigh these initial investments (NIDA, 2020a).

A diversified funding strategy is recommended to maximize available resources and mitigate risks associated with reliance on a single source. European Union Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) and the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) represent a potential €7.5 million funding source. These EU funds aim to support member states in various areas, including health system strengthening, social inclusion, and regional development (European Commission, n.d.-a; European Commission, n.d.-b). Accessing these funds typically involves developing comprehensive project proposals aligned with specific EU priorities and national operational programs, often requiring co-financing and demonstrating long-term sustainability.

The National Health Fund could contribute €4.2 million through earmarked addiction treatment allocation. National health systems are primary funders of healthcare, including addiction treatment. In many countries, specific budget lines or allocations are made for mental health and substance abuse services. For example, in Canada, provincial health authorities receive federal transfers that contribute to funding addiction services as part of overall healthcare (Government of Canada, 2023a).

Regional government budget could provide €3.1 million as matched funding. Regional contributions demonstrate local commitment and can be tailored to specific regional needs. This co-funding model is common in many decentralized health systems. Municipal contributions of €1.8 million, proportional to population served, further ensure that services are responsive to community needs and foster local ownership. Private foundation grants of €1.2 million targeted to innovative interventions could also play a crucial role in funding pilot programs, research, and innovative approaches that government funding may not initially cover.

It is important to critically analyze potential challenges with these funding mechanisms. Reliance on project-based EU funds can lead to sustainability issues once the project period ends. National and regional budgets may be subject to political shifts and economic downturns. Securing diverse funding requires significant administrative effort in grant writing and reporting. A clear strategy for transitioning successful pilot programs to mainstream funding is essential.

Achieving long-term sustainability is paramount to ensure that effective interventions become embedded within the health system. Integration of successful interventions into standard National Health Fund reimbursement mechanisms is a critical step. In the US, for example, efforts have been made to ensure Medicaid and private insurance cover a continuum of SUD care, including MAT (SAMHSA, 2023b). However, reimbursement rates and administrative hurdles can still pose challenges (NASEM, 2016). Advocacy for adequate reimbursement for evidence-based addiction services, including telehealth, is crucial.

Development of value-based payment (VBP) models rewarding improved addiction treatment outcomes can shift incentives from fee-for-service to models that reward providers for delivering high-quality, effective care. VBP programs reward healthcare providers with incentive payments for the quality of care they give, not just the quantity of services (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS], 2023). SAMHSA has explored VBP for SUD services, emphasizing its potential to support recovery through mechanisms like employment (SAMHSA, 2023c; Center for Health Care Strategies, 2018). Metrics for VBP in addiction care could include treatment retention, abstinence rates, improvements in functioning, and reductions in hospital readmissions.

A gradual transition from project-based to operational funding over 5-7 years helps ensure that successful pilot initiatives are not discontinued due to lack of ongoing funding, a common pitfall in public health. Comprehensive workforce development strategies are also essential. Rural areas often struggle with recruitment and retention of qualified addiction professionals (Pullen & Oser, 2014; Rural Health Information Hub, 2024). Strategies include expanding training programs for addiction specialists, integrating addiction medicine into general medical education, offering financial incentives for practice in rural/underserved areas, supporting ongoing professional development, and training and deploying peer support specialists (SAMHSA, 2017).

The economic case for investing in addiction treatment is strong. While precise ROI figures can vary based on the interventions implemented, populations served, and methodologies used for calculation, international evidence consistently demonstrates significant returns. NIDA (2020a) reports that, in the United States, every dollar spent on addiction treatment programs can yield a return of between $4 and $7 in reduced drug-related crime, criminal justice costs, and theft. When savings related to healthcare are included, total savings can exceed a ratio of 12 to 1. It is important to acknowledge that these ROI calculations often involve complex assumptions and may not be directly transferable without local adaptation and study (Cartwright, 2000). However, studies in Australia (Shanahan et al., 2006) and Europe (Rehm et al., 2013) also show positive economic returns from SUD treatment, primarily through reduced healthcare costs, increased productivity, and decreased criminal justice involvement. A Polish-specific study by Gorynski et al. (2015) on the economic burden of alcohol in Poland also highlights substantial costs associated with untreated addiction, implying significant potential savings from effective interventions. While a precise local ROI of €3.40 per €1 invested requires specific regional modeling, the principle of substantial net economic benefit from investing in evidence-based rural addiction treatment is well-supported.

Comprehensive Approaches to Addiction

An effective addiction strategy must be comprehensive, encompassing prevention, harm reduction, treatment, and recovery support, tailored to community needs and addressing social determinants of health.

Prevention efforts aim to stop substance use before it starts or to delay onset and mitigate progression to disorder. These include universal prevention targeting entire populations (e.g., school-based programs on decision-making and resilience, public awareness campaigns), selective prevention targeting at-risk groups (e.g., children of parents with SUDs, youth in underserved communities), and indicated prevention targeting individuals already experimenting with substances (e.g., brief interventions). Evidence-based prevention programs, such as those reviewed by the European Society for Prevention Research (EUSPR, n.d., retrieved October 26, 2023), can yield significant long-term savings and health benefits.

Harm reduction encompasses policies, programs, and practices that aim to minimize the negative health, social, and economic consequences associated with drug use, without necessarily requiring cessation of use (International Harm Reduction Association, 2010). Key evidence-based harm reduction strategies include naloxone distribution programs, needle and syringe programs (NSPs), opioid agonist treatment (OAT), and supervised consumption services (SCS). Integrating harm reduction services is vital for engaging hard-to-reach populations and reducing acute harms.

The effective use of funding and coordinated efforts should prioritize evidence-based treatments. These include Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorder and alcohol use disorder. MAT is proven to reduce illicit drug use, overdose deaths, and criminal activity, and improve social functioning (NIDA, 2020a; SAMHSA, 2023b). Systematic reviews confirm the effectiveness of MAT, particularly OAT, in improving outcomes (Mattick et al., 2014). Psychosocial therapies such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Motivational Interviewing (MI), and contingency management have strong evidence bases for various SUDs (NIDA, 2020a; Magill et al., 2019). Integrated care for co-occurring disorders is essential given the high prevalence of co-occurring mental health conditions among individuals with SUDs. Integrated treatment addressing both is more effective than treating either condition in isolation (Drake et al., 2001; Kelly & Freset, 2021). This requires close collaboration between mental health and addiction services.

Telehealth and digital interventions have emerged as crucial tools, especially for improving access in rural and underserved areas, and their use accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic (SAMHSA, 2021a). These include telemedicine consultations for assessment, MAT prescribing, and counseling; web-based interventions and mobile apps for self-management, relapse prevention, and recovery support; and virtual peer support groups. Evidence suggests telehealth can be as effective as in-person care for many SUD services (Lin et al., 2019; NIDA, 2023). Challenges include the digital divide (access to technology and internet), ensuring privacy, and adapting regulatory frameworks. Poland has seen an increase in telehealth adoption, and further integration into addiction services should be explored (Golinowska et al., 2020).

Recovery is a long-term process requiring ongoing support. Community-based recovery supports and peer services are vital components, including peer support specialists, recovery community organizations (RCOs), mutual aid groups, and support for housing, employment, and education.

Addressing Diversity and Cultural Competence

The Pomorskie region, like many others, has diverse populations. Addiction services must be culturally competent and responsive to the specific needs of different groups, including ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, older adults, and youth. This involves training staff in cultural humility and culturally sensitive communication, providing materials and services in relevant languages, adapting interventions to be culturally appropriate (NIDA, 2020a), and engaging community leaders from diverse groups in planning and outreach. Failure to address cultural factors can lead to disparities in access and outcomes (SAMHSA, 2014).

Ethical Considerations in Addiction Policy Implementation

Implementing addiction policy requires careful attention to ethical principles. Autonomy and informed consent ensure individuals can make informed choices about their treatment, respecting their right to refuse or choose among available options. Confidentiality and privacy protect sensitive patient information, especially crucial in rural areas where anonymity may be a concern (Pullen & Oser, 2014). Data privacy in digital health interventions is also paramount. Equity and justice ensure fair access to services for all, regardless of socioeconomic status, location, or other characteristics, addressing systemic barriers that disproportionately affect certain populations. Beneficence and non-maleficence strive to maximize benefits and minimize harm in all interventions and policies. Stigma reduction actively works to reduce public and self-stigma associated with addiction, as it is a major barrier to help-seeking and social reintegration (WHO, 2021a).

Stigma Reduction Strategies

Stigma associated with SUDs is a pervasive barrier to accessing care and achieving recovery. Policy should incorporate multi-level stigma reduction strategies including public awareness campaigns using person-first language, sharing recovery stories, and educating the public about addiction as a treatable health condition. Provider training educates healthcare professionals and others to recognize and address their own biases. Policy reform, such as decriminalization of personal use (as seen in Portugal) can contribute to reducing stigma, though this must be coupled with robust health and social support systems (Transform Drug Policy Foundation, 2021). Involving people with lived experience is powerful in challenging stereotypes.

Recent Data and Statistics on Addiction and Treatment

Globally, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) reported that in 2021, approximately 296 million people (aged 15-64) used drugs at least once, an increase of 23% over the previous decade (2011-2021). Furthermore, the number of people suffering from drug use disorders rose to 39.5 million globally in 2021, a 45% increase in 10 years (UNODC, 2023, p. 12). Despite the high prevalence, a significant treatment gap persists worldwide.

In Europe, the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) highlights ongoing challenges with opioid use, stimulants, and cannabis, with varying treatment coverage across member states (EMCDDA, 2023a). For instance, while opioid agonist treatment (OAT) coverage has improved, access to comprehensive care for other SUDs remains a concern. The EMCDDA (2023b) also notes emerging trends, such as the increasing availability and use of new psychoactive substances and changes in drug markets due to digitalization. Data for Poland specifically indicates that alcohol use disorders are a significant public health concern, alongside growing issues with illicit drugs and prescription medication misuse (Parczewska et al., 2021; EMCDDA, 2022b - Poland Country Drug Report).

In the United States, the 2022 National Survey on Drug Use and Health indicated that 48.7 million people aged 12 or older (17.3% of this population) had a substance use disorder in the past year, yet only 24% of those with an illicit drug use disorder received any treatment (SAMHSA, 2023d, pp. 33, 47).

Policy Comparisons and Transferability

Portugal decriminalized personal use of all drugs in 2001, shifting focus to a health-led approach. Implementation involves "Commissions for the Dissuasion of Drug Addiction," multi-stakeholder bodies (legal, health, social work professionals) that assess needs and refer individuals to treatment or other services. Funding is primarily through the Ministry of Health (Transform Drug Policy Foundation, 2021). Long-term evaluations suggest positive outcomes in terms of reduced drug-induced deaths, HIV infections, and drug-related crime, though challenges remain, and the model's success is attributed to a broad expansion of treatment and harm reduction services alongside decriminalization (Hughes & Stevens, 2010; Domoslawski, 2011/2014). Transferability requires careful consideration of the local socio-political context and resource availability.

Switzerland is known for its pragmatic "four-pillar" policy (prevention, therapy, harm reduction, law enforcement). Heroin-assisted treatment (HAT) is a key component, integrated into the health system and funded by health insurance and public funds. This required significant coordination between health authorities, social services, and law enforcement (Klingemann & Burki, 2001; Nordt & Stohler, 2006). The success of this model highlights the value of comprehensive, evidence-based approaches.

In response to its opioid crisis, Canada has implemented a multi-faceted strategy involving federal, provincial, and territorial collaboration. Funding flows from various levels of government to support prevention, treatment (including MAT and supervised consumption sites), and harm reduction services. The strategy emphasizes a whole-of-society approach, engaging multiple stakeholders (Government of Canada, 2023a). Recent data (Government of Canada, 2023b) show ongoing high rates of opioid-related harms, underscoring the persistent challenges even with comprehensive strategies.

Oregon (USA) Measure 110 decriminalized small amounts of drugs and directed cannabis tax revenue to fund addiction services through "Behavioral Health Resource Networks." Implementation involves an Oversight and Accountability Council with diverse representation to oversee funding distribution (Oregon Health Authority, n.d., retrieved October 26, 2023). Early implementation has faced challenges, including slower-than-anticipated rollout of services and debates about impact, highlighting the complexities of such reforms (Humphreys et al., 2023).

When considering these international examples for the Pomorskie region, it is crucial to assess their transferability. Policy approaches must be adapted to Poland's specific legal, cultural, economic, and healthcare system context. This involves leveraging local research, engaging Polish stakeholders, and potentially piloting interventions before wider rollout.

Current and Emerging Challenges in Addiction Policy Implementation

Despite best intentions, several challenges can impede effective policy implementation. Social stigma surrounding addiction remains a significant barrier to help-seeking and can affect resource allocation and community support for treatment facilities (WHO, 2021a; Livingston et al., 2012). Workforce shortages and training gaps limit access to quality care, particularly in rural and underserved areas (Pullen & Oser, 2014; Rural Health Information Hub, 2024). Funding instability and inadequacy can undermine the sustainability of programs and limit their reach and comprehensiveness. Lack of standardized data collection and robust monitoring systems makes it difficult to assess program effectiveness, identify emerging trends, and make data-driven policy adjustments (EMCDDA, 2023a). Siloed health and social care systems often fail to address the multifaceted needs of individuals with SUDs, leading to fragmented care (Health Foundation, 2022; NASEM, 2016).

Rural areas face unique challenges including transportation difficulties, limited service availability, concerns about confidentiality and anonymity, and workforce recruitment and retention issues (Pullen & Oser, 2014). Limited broadband access can also hinder telehealth implementation. Effectively integrating mental health and addiction treatment remains a significant challenge in many systems (Drake et al., 2001). The rise of synthetic opioids, new psychoactive substances, and online drug sales presents ongoing challenges for prevention, treatment, and law enforcement (UNODC, 2023). Disparities often exist based on socioeconomic status, ethnicity, geographic location, and other factors (SAMHSA, 2014).

Addressing these challenges requires sustained political will, strategic investment, continuous quality improvement, robust research and evaluation, and the active involvement of all stakeholders, particularly those with lived experience. The framework and funding mechanisms proposed aim to build a resilient, equitable, and responsive system capable of meeting the complex needs of individuals with SUDs in regions like Pomorskie, drawing on local strengths and international evidence. Case studies of successful rural addiction treatment implementation, such as those focusing on integrated care models or innovative telehealth solutions (e.g., Fortney et al., 2015), can offer valuable lessons, though direct applicability to the Polish context would need careful assessment.

Conclusion

The urban-rural divide in addiction treatment access in Poland's Pomorskie region represents a significant public health challenge that demands comprehensive, evidence-based policy responses. This analysis has revealed that while urban centers maintain relatively robust addiction services, rural residents face formidable barriers including geographic isolation, transportation difficulties, workforce shortages, and heightened stigma. These disparities not only impact individual health outcomes but also contribute to broader social and economic costs.

Our examination of international best practices demonstrates that effective solutions exist and can be adapted to the Polish context. Telemedicine offers promising opportunities to bridge geographic divides, as evidenced by successful implementations in Estonia and Scotland. The hub-and-spoke model from Vermont provides a framework for extending specialized addiction care into rural communities through strategic partnerships with primary care providers. Workforce development initiatives from Australia and Norway offer blueprints for attracting and retaining qualified professionals in underserved areas.

The proposed multi-phase implementation strategy addresses immediate needs while building toward systemic transformation. Short-term interventions focused on telemedicine and transportation assistance can quickly improve access, while medium-term investments in workforce development and community-based treatment expansion build capacity. Long-term system transformation aims to create a comprehensive continuum of care that includes prevention, early intervention, treatment, and recovery support.

Successful implementation will require overcoming significant challenges. Securing sustainable funding beyond initial investments, addressing persistent stigma, navigating regulatory barriers, and building robust data systems for monitoring and evaluation all demand attention. Strong multi-stakeholder coordination is essential, bringing together health authorities, local governments, primary care providers, specialists, patient advocates, and community organizations.

The economic case for investment is compelling. International evidence consistently demonstrates that comprehensive addiction treatment yields substantial returns through reduced healthcare utilization, decreased criminal justice involvement, and improved productivity. While precise figures require local modeling, the principle of net economic benefit is well-established.

Perhaps most importantly, this policy approach recognizes addiction as a complex health condition requiring a nuanced, person-centered response rather than simplistic solutions. By strengthening data collection, adapting evidence-based models to local realities, investing in a diverse and well-supported rural workforce, fostering innovation in service delivery, and promoting genuine community engagement, Poland can make substantial progress in ensuring that all citizens, regardless of geographic location, have equitable access to effective addiction prevention, treatment, and recovery support.

The path forward requires sustained commitment from policymakers, healthcare leaders, and communities. It demands adequate resources, regulatory flexibility, and a willingness to challenge stigmatizing attitudes. Yet the potential benefits—improved health outcomes, stronger families, revitalized communities, and reduced social costs—make this investment not just worthwhile but essential. By addressing the urban-rural divide in addiction treatment, Pomorskie has an opportunity to become a model for equitable, effective addiction care that respects the dignity and potential of all its residents.

References

Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7

Abdul-Quader, A. S., Feelemyer, J., Modi, S., Stein, E. S., Briceno, A., Semaan, S., ... & Des Jarlais, D. C. (2013). Effectiveness of structural-level needle/syringe programs to reduce HCV and HIV infection among people who inject drugs: A systematic review. AIDS and Behavior, 17(9), 2878–2892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0593-y

Abrams, Z. E., Savarese, E., & Gashlin, L. (2022). Telehealth for opioid use disorder in rural communities: A literature review of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Journal of Rural Mental Health, 46(3), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/rmh0000204

Access Economics. (2008). Review of the Rural Health Workforce Strategy. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.

Allan, B., & Smylie, J. (2015). First Peoples, second class treatment: The role of racism in the health and well-being of Indigenous peoples in Canada. The Wellesley Institute.

American Addiction Centers. (2024, February 28). Medication assisted treatment (MAT): Addiction medications. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://americanaddictioncenters.org/addiction-medications

American Addiction Centers. (2024, June 18). Drug detox: Process, side effects & detox centers near me. Retrieved from https://americanaddictioncenters.org/drug-detox

American Institutes for Research (AIR). (2021, November 19). Exploring Urban-Rural Disparities in Accessing Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder. AIR. https://www.air.org/resource/field/exploring-urban-rural-disparities-accessing-treatment-opioid-use-disorder

American Medical Association (AMA). (2023). Telehealth policy. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital/telehealth-policy

American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2023, June 27). APA Letter to Senate HELP Committee on Health Care Workforce Shortages. APA. Retrieved from https://www.psychiatry.org/getattachment/ecd69d9f-60ed-4984-8428-debfa5a2c760/APA-Letter-Senate-HELP-Workforce-Shortages-06272023.pdf

American Psychiatric Association. (2020). The APA Telepsychiatry Toolkit. APA Publishing.

American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM). (n.d.). About ASAM. Retrieved from https://www.asam.org/

American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM). (n.d.). About The ASAM Criteria. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from https://www.asam.org/asam-criteria/about-the-asam-criteria

Archer, J., Bower, P., Gilbody, S., Lovell, K., Richards, D., Gask, L., ... & Coventry, P. (2012). Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (10), CD006525. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006525.pub2

Arora, S., Kalishman, S., Thornton, K., Dion, D., Murata, G., Parish, B., ... & Komaromy, M. (2011). Expanding access to hepatitis C virus treatment—Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) project: disruptive innovation in specialty care. Hepatology, 54(6), 1965-1973. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.24660

Association of American Medical Colleges. (2023, May 1). Response to the Opioid Crisis is Hampered by Physician Workforce Shortages.

Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. (n.d.-a). Stronger Rural Health Strategy. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/stronger-rural-health-strategy

Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. (n.d.-b). Health Workforce Scholarship Program (HWSP). Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/health-workforce-scholarship-program-hwsp

Babor, T. F., McRee, B. G., Kassebaum, P. A., Grimaldi, P. L., Ahmed, K., & Bray, J. (2007). Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): toward a public health approach to the management of substance abuse. Substance Abuse, 28(3), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.1300/J465v28n03_03

Bacigalupe, A., Esnaola, S., Martín, U., & Calderón, C. (2021). Implementing telehealth in rural areas: A scoping review of European experiences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18211139

Bassuk, E., Hanson, J., Greene, R. N., Richard, M., & Laudet, A. (2016). Peer-delivered recovery support services for addictions in the United States: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 63, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2016.01.003

Beardsley, K., Wish, E. D., Fitzelle, D. B., O'Grady, K., & Arria, A. M. (2003). Distance traveled to outpatient drug treatment and client retention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25(4), 279-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0740-5472(03)00154-9

Best, D., & Laudet, A. (2010). The potential of recovery capital. RSA Projects.

Blueprint for Health. (n.d.). Hub and Spoke. Vermont Agency of Human Services. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://blueprintforhealth.vermont.gov/about-blueprint/hub-and-spoke

British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (BCCSU). (2022). Guideline for the clinical management of opioid use disorder. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://www.bccsu.ca/care-guidance-publications/

Brodey, B. B., Hinde, J. M., Formica, M. K., Fingerhood, M., & Weintraub, E. (2021). Mobile telemedicine for buprenorphine treatment in rural, underserved communities. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 47(6), 725–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2021.1963895

Brooklyn, J. R., & Sigmon, S. C. (2017). Vermont hub-and-spoke model of care for opioid use disorder: Development, implementation, and impact. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 11(4), 286-292. https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000000310

Brooklyn, J. R., & Sigmon, S. C. (2017). Vermont hub-and-spoke model of care for opioid use disorder: Development, implementation, and impact. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 11(4), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000000310

Bruen, B. K., Kavoogian, A., & Kilaru, A. (2016). Non-Emergency Medical Transportation: A Vital Lifeline for Vulnerable Patients. The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured.

Bundesgesundheitsministerium. (2022). Stärkung der Gesundheitsversorgung in ländlichen Regionen [Strengthening healthcare in rural regions]. Retrieved from [Insert actual German Ministry of Health URL]

Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network. (2019). Mobile supervised consumption services: A practical and legal guide. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://www.hivlegalnetwork.ca/site/mobile-supervised-consumption-services-a-practical-and-legal-guide/

Cartwright, W. S. (2000). Cost-benefit analysis of drug treatment services: Review of the literature. The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 3(1), 11-26.

CBOS (Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej). (2019). Stosunek Polaków do osób chorujących psychicznie [Polish attitudes towards people with mental illness]. Komunikat z badań nr 101/2019. CBOS.

Center for Health Care Strategies. (2018, June). Exploring Value Based Payment to Encourage Substance Use Disorder Treatment in Primary Care. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from https://www.chcs.org/media/VBP-for-SUD_Final_June-2018.pdf

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2024, April 25). Treatment of Substance Use Disorders. CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/overdose-prevention/treatment/index.html

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). (2023, September 25). What are the value-based programs? Retrieved October 26, 2023, from https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality/value-based-programs

Centrum e-Zdrowia. (n.d.). Strategia e-zdrowia. Retrieved from https://www.cez.gov.pl/

CKF Addiction Treatment. (n.d.). The Transportation Barrier. CKF. Retrieved February 18, 2024, from https://ckfaddictiontreatment.org/the-transportation-barrier/

Cleveland Clinic. (n.d.). Substance Use Disorder (SUD): Symptoms & Treatment. Cleveland Clinic. Retrieved May 23, 2024, from https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/16652-drug-addiction-substance-use-disorder-sud

Cole, E. S., DiDomenico, E., Pastor, A., Atlantic Research & Evaluation, Inc., & Maine Office of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services. (2019). Impact of medication-assisted treatment on hospital and emergency department utilization and cost. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 99, 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2019.01.003

Crapanzano, K. A., Hammarlund, R., Ahmad, B., Hunsinger, N., & Kullar, R. (2019). The association between perceived stigma and substance use disorder treatment outcomes: a review. Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation, 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S183252

CU Anschutz Medical Campus. (2024, January 9). Key Takeaways from Largest-Ever Addiction Prevention and Treatment Implementation Study. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from https://news.cuanschutz.edu/department-of-medicine/addiction-prevention-treatment-implementation-study

Cylus, J., Richardson, E., & Findley, L. (Eds.). (2019). Poland: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 21(4), 1–184. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.

Davis, C. S., & Carr, D. H. (2017). Legal and policy strategies to support naloxone distribution and use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 173(Suppl 1), S60–S65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.09.027

Domoslawski, A. (2011/2014). Drug policy in Portugal: The benefits of decriminalizing drug use. Open Society Foundations. (Original work published 2011)

Drake, R. E., Essock, S. M., Shaner, A., Carey, K. B., Minkoff, K., Kola, L., ... & Rickards, L. (2001). Implementing dual diagnosis services for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 52(4), 469-476. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.469

Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). (2023, May 9). DEA, SAMHSA extend COVID-19 telemedicine flexibilities for 6 months while proposing rules to expand access to buprenorphine for opioid use disorder. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://www.dea.gov/press-releases/2023/05/09/dea-samhsa-extend-covid-19-telemedicine-flexibilities-6-months-while

e-Estonia. (n.d.). E-Health. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://e-estonia.com/solutions/healthcare/e-health-record/

EMCDDA. (2022b). Poland Country Drug Report 2022. Publications Office of the European Union.

EMCDDA. (2023a). European Drug Report 2023: Trends and Developments. Publications Office of the European Union.

EMCDDA. (2023b). EU Drug Markets: Key insights for policy and practice. Publications Office of the European Union.

EuroHealthNet. (2018). Addressing health inequalities in rural areas: A review of European initiatives.

European Commission. (2020). Telemedicine for the EU: Current status and the way forward. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Commission. (2022). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022 - Estonia. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi-estonia

European Commission. (n.d.-a). Drug policy. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/internal-security/organised-crime-and-human-trafficking/drug-policy_en

European Commission. (n.d.-b). Recovery and Resilience Facility. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en

European Commission. (n.d.). European Social Fund Plus (ESF+). Retrieved from [Insert actual EU Commission ESF+ URL]

European Commission. (n.d.). European Social Fund Plus. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/european-social-fund-plus/pl

European Committee of the Regions. (2024, April 17). Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions – Mental Health. (2024/C 156/03). Official Journal of the European Union, C/2024/2711. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52023IR4544

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). (2019). European Drug Report 2019: Trends and Developments. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). (2021). Harm reduction: evidence, practice and developments. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). (2022a). COVID-19 and people who use drugs: impact and responses. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). (2023a). European Drug Report 2023: Trends and Developments. Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/european-drug-report/2023_en

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). (2023a). Poland Country Drug Report 2023. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). (2023b). European Drug Report 2023: Trends and Developments. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). (2023b). Poland: Country Drug Report 2023. Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/countries/poland_en

European Society for Prevention Research (EUSPR). (n.d.). EUSPR Prevention Resources. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from https://euspr.org/resources/

Eurostat. (2021). Rural areas in the EU. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/rural-development/statistics-illustrated

Fortney, J. C., Burgess, J. F., Bosworth, H. B., Booth, B. M., & Kaboli, P. J. (2013). A re-conceptualization of access for 21st century healthcare. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(Suppl 2), 556-567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2500-7

Fortney, J. C., Muthukumar, S., Unützer, J., Hantke, M., & Curran, G. M. (2016). A systematic review of the evidence for 8 innovative practices to improve access to and quality of care for depression in primary care. The Annals of Family Medicine, 14(4), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1950

Fortney, J. C., Pyne, J. M., Mouden, S. B., Mittal, D., Hudson, T. J., Schroeder, G. W., ... & Guffin, M. T. (2015). Practice-based versus telemedicine-based collaborative care for depression in rural federally qualified health centers: a pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 172(11), 1084-1094. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14101295

Fortney, J., Rost, K., Zhang, M., & Warren, J. (1999). The impact of geographic accessibility on the intensity and quality of depression treatment. Medical Care, 37(9), 884-893.

Gale, J. A., & Hawley, S. R. (2017). Rural Health Workforce: Challenges and Policy Options. Rural Policy Brief, 2017(3), 1-8. Maine Rural Health Research Center.

Galea, S., & Stuber, J. (2006). The values of qualitative research in the study of addictions. Addiction, 101(4), 476–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01400.x

Główny Urząd Statystyczny (GUS) Pomorskie. (2023). Rocznik Statystyczny Województwa Pomorskiego [Statistical Yearbook of Pomorskie Voivodeship]. GUS. [Insert specific URL or report identifier]

Główny Urząd Statystyczny (GUS). (2022). Ochrona zdrowia w 2021 roku [Healthcare in 2021]. GUS. [Insert specific URL or report identifier]

Główny Urząd Statystyczny (GUS). (2023). Pracujący w gospodarce narodowej w Polsce [Employed persons in the national economy in Poland]. GUS. [Insert specific URL or report identifier for health workforce data]

Golinowska, S., Sowa-Kofta, A., & Włodarczyk, C. W. (2020). Telemedicine in Poland: Is it the right time for a breakthrough? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8193. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218193

Gone, J. P., & Trimble, J. E. (2012). American Indian and Alaska Native mental health: Diverse perspectives on enduring disparities. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143127

Gorynski, P., Holownia-Voloskova, M., & Wojtyniak, B. (2015). The economic burden of alcohol in Poland. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania, 28(3), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alkona.2015.08.001

Government of Canada. (2023a, August 23). Federal actions on the overdose crisis. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/opioids/federal-actions.html

Government of Canada. (2023b, September). Opioid- and Stimulant-related Harms in Canada. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from https://health-infobase.canada.ca/substance-related-harms/opioids-stimulants/

GUS (Główny Urząd Statystyczny). (2022). Społeczeństwo informacyjne w Polsce w 2022 roku [Information society in Poland in 2022]. GUS.

Haffajee, R. L., Bohnert, A. S. B., Coles, H. B., Maughan, D., & Lin, L. A. (2023). Rural-urban disparities in the availability of hospital-based addiction treatment services. SSM - Population Health, 24, 101532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101532

Hawkins, J. D., Brown, E. C., Oesterle, S., Arthur, M. W., Abbott, R. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2008). Early effects of Communities That Care on targeted risks and initiation of delinquent behavior and substance use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.11.001

Health Foundation. (2022). Joined-up care: The case for integration of health and social care in England. The Health Foundation.

Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA). (2021). National Health Service Corps: Building healthy communities. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://nhsc.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/nhsc/program-resources/nhsc-infographic.pdf

Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA). (n.d.). National Health Service Corps. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://nhsc.hrsa.gov/

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). (2023a, December 11). Behavioral Health Workforce 2023 Brief. HRSA. Retrieved from https://bhw.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bureau-health-workforce/Behavioral-Health-Workforce-Brief-2023.pdf

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). (2023b, January 12). Removal of X-Waiver to Prescribe Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder. HRSA. Retrieved from https://www.hrsa.gov/opioids/practitioner-resources/sud-treatment-buprenorphine

Hedegaard, H., Minino, A. M., & Warner, M. (2023). Drug overdose deaths in the United States, 1999–2021. NCHS Data Brief, no 457. National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db457.htm

Heitkamp, T., Vest, B., & Jones-Story, T. (2019). Behavioral health challenges in rural and frontier communities. Mountain Plains Mental Health Technology Transfer Center.

Helgason, A. R., Andersson, M., & Hallgren, M. (2019). Challenges and innovations in rural mental healthcare: A review of Scandinavian initiatives. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 73(3), 155-163. [Hypothetical citation for illustration of type of source]

Hendryx, M., Lòpez-Cevallos, D. F., & Zullig, K. J. (2020). Rural-urban disparities in access to health care in the United States. International Journal for Equity in Health, 19(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01243-5

Hilty, D. M., Ferrer, D. C., Parish, M. B., Johnston, B., Callahan, E. J., & Yellowlees, P. M. (2013). The effectiveness of telemental health: a 2013 review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 19(6), 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2013.0075

HM Government. (2021, December 6). From harm to hope: A 10-year drugs plan to cut crime and save lives. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/from-harm-to-hope-a-10-year-drugs-plan-to-cut-crime-and-save-lives

Hughes, C. E., & Stevens, A. (2010). What can we learn from the Portuguese decriminalization of illicit drugs? British Journal of Criminology, 50(6), 999-1022. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq038

Humphreys, J., Wakerman, J., Pashen, D., & Buykx, P. (2015). Retention of allied health professionals in rural and remote Australia: A scoping review. Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute.

Humphreys, K., Shover, C. L., & Caulkins, J. P. (2023). Oregon's drug decriminalization: What has happened, what is working, and what is not? JAMA Psychiatry, 80(9), 877–878. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.2209

International Harm Reduction Association. (2010). What is harm reduction? A position statement from the International Harm Reduction Association. IHRA.

Islam, M. M., Topp, L., Conigrave, K. M., van Beek, I., Maher, L., White, A., & Haber, P. S. (2018). The effectiveness of syringe exchange programs and other harm reduction interventions for hepatitis C prevention among people who inject drugs. Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 12(5), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2018.1459498

Joint Research Centre (JRC). (2023). Monitoring the SDGs in Pomorskie Region: A JRC Local Data for Action Report. Publications Office of the European Union. JRC134402. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC134402/JRC134402_01.pdf

Jones, C. M., Shoff, C., Blanco, C., Lyerla, R., & Compton, W. M. (2022). The rapid expansion of telehealth for opioid use disorder treatment in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Network Open, 5(1), e2144251. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44251

Kelly, J. F., & Freset, T. (2021). The co-occurrence of substance use and mental health disorders: A focused review of evidence and implications for practice. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 41(1), 06. https://doi.org/10.35946/arcr.v41.1.06

Kennedy, M. C., Karamouzian, M., & Kerr, T. (2017). Public health and public order outcomes associated with supervised drug consumption facilities: a systematic review. Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 14(5), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-017-0363-y

Khatri, U. G., & Perrone, J. (2022). Opioid use disorder and COVID-19: A syndemic. Journal of the American Medical Association, 327(7), 617–618. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.24351

Klich, J., & Gadomska, M. (2021). Shortages of medical staff in rural Poland: Causes and potential solutions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6543. [Hypothetical citation for illustration of type of source]

Klingemann, H., & Burki, M. (2001). The Swiss four-pillar model: An evaluation of the heroin-assisted treatment. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften, 18(1), 59-70.

Krajowe Biuro ds. Przeciwdziałania Narkomanii (KBPN). (2020). Raport Krajowy 2019: Problem Narkotyków i Narkomanii w Polsce [National Report 2019: The Problem of Drugs and Drug Addiction in Poland]. KBPN.

Krajowe Biuro ds. Przeciwdziałania Narkomanii (KBPN). (2021). Raport Krajowy 2020: Sytuacja narkotykowa w Polsce [National Report 2020: The drug situation in Poland]. KBPN.

Krajowe Biuro ds. Przeciwdziałania Narkomanii (KBPN). (2023). Narkomania w Polsce 2022: Raport Krajowy [Drug Addiction in Poland 2022: National Report]. KBPN. [This would be the actual annual report; specific title and year would vary]

Krajowe Biuro ds. Przeciwdziałania Narkomanii (KBPN). (annual reports). [Specific reports on treatment accessibility, facility distribution, or regional analyses would be cited here]. KBPN.

Krajowe Biuro ds. Przeciwdziałania Narkomanii (KBPN). (n.d.). O nas [About Us]. Retrieved from https://www.kbpn.gov.pl/portal?id=15

Krajowe Centrum Przeciwdziałania Uzależnieniom (KCPU). (n.d.). Programy. Retrieved from https://www.kcpu.gov.pl/

Kristjansson, A. L., Mann, M. J., Sigfusson, J., Thorisdottir, I. E., Allegrante, J. P., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2020). Development and guiding principles of the Icelandic model for preventing adolescent substance use. Health Promotion Practice, 21(1), 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839919869030

Ku, L., Jones, E., Shin, P., Byrne, F. R., & Long, S. K. (2011). Safety-Net Providers After Health Care Reform: Lessons From Massachusetts. The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured.

Lenardson, J. D., Gale, J. A., & Ziller, E. C. (2016). Rural and urban differences in the associations of housing, transportation, and food insecurity with health. Maine Rural Health Research Center.

Lin, L. A., Casteel, D., Shigekawa, E., Weyrich, M. S., Roby, D. H., & McMenamin, S. B. (2021). Telehealth delivery of substance use disorder services: a systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 120, 108152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108152

Lin, L., Casteel, D., Shigekawa, E., Weyrich, M. S.,

Lin, L., Casteel, D., Shigekawa, E., Weyrich, M. S., Roby, D. H., & McMenamin, S. B. (2019). Telemedicine-delivered treatment interventions for substance use disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 101, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2019.03.007

Lin, L., Casteel, D., Shigekawa, E., Weyrich, M. S., Roby, D. H., & McMenamin, S. B. (2019a). Telemedicine-delivered treatment interventions for substance use disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 101, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2019.03.007

Linas, B. S., Savinkina, A., Gikandi, P. W., ... & Assoumou, S. A. (2020). The impact of psychiatric comorbidity on treatment discontinuation among patients initiating buprenorphine or naltrexone for opioid use disorder. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 216, 108244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108244

Livingston, J. D., Milne, T., Fang, M. L., & Amari, E. (2012). The effectiveness

Livingston, J. D., Milne, T., Fang, M. L., & Amari, E. (2012). The effectiveness of interventions for reducing stigma related to substance use disorders: a systematic review. Addiction, 107(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03601.x

Madras, B. K., Compton, W. M., Avula, D., Stegbauer, T., Stein, J. B., & Clark, H. W. (2009). Screening, brief interventions, referral to treatment (SBIRT) for illicit drug and alcohol use at multiple healthcare sites: comparison at intake and 6 months. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 99(1-3), 280-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.08.003

Marino, A., Morgan, A., & Scott, J. (2016). Mobile health outreach in Europe: A systematic review. European Journal of Public Health, 26(suppl_1), ckw171-021. [Hypothetical citation for illustration of type of source]

Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet, 365(9464), 1099–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71146-6

McKay, J. R. (2009). Continuing care research: What we have learned and where we are going. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36(2), 131-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2008.10.004

Ministère de la Santé et de la Prévention. (n.d.). Contrat d'engagement de service public (CESP). Retrieved from [Insert actual French Ministry of Health URL for CESP]

Ministerstwo Zdrowia. (n.d.). Narodowy Program Zdrowia [National Health Programme]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.pl/web/zdrowie/narodowy-program-zdrowia

Ministry of Health (Ministerstwo Zdrowia). (2021). Narodowy Program Przeciwdziałania Narkomanii na lata 2021-2025 [National Program for Counteracting Drug Addiction for 2021-2025]. Monitor Polski. [Insert specific legal gazette reference]

Ministry of Health Poland. (2021). Narodowy Program Zdrowia na lata 2021-2025 [National Health Programme for 2021-2025]. Monitor Polski.

Misiak, B., & Szcześniak, D. (2021). Opioid substitution treatment in Poland: Current state and challenges. Psychiatria Polska, 55(1), 5-18. [Hypothetical citation for illustration of type of source]

Mohr, N. M., Harland, K. K., Shane, D. M., Miller, M. J., Bell, A., & Ward, M. M. (2024). Rural-urban disparities in the availability of hospital-based addiction services. Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, 157, 109271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2023.109271

Moskalewicz, J., & Kocoń, K. (2020). Społeczne i zdrowotne skutki picia alkoholu w Polsce wiejskiej [Social and health consequences of alcohol consumption in rural Poland]. Instytut Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa PAN. [Hypothetical citation for illustration of type of source]

NAADAC, the Association for Addiction Professionals. (n.d.). About NAADAC. Retrieved from https://www.naadac.org/

Naczelna Izba Lekarska. (2022). Raport o liczbie lekarzy i lekarzy dentystów [Report on the number of physicians and dentists]. NIL.

Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia (NFZ). (2023). [Specific reports or communications on healthcare reforms or funding mechanisms for addiction treatment]. NFZ. [Insert specific NFZ document identifier]

National Center for Mobility Management. (2019, August 6). Removing Transportation Barriers for Addiction Treatment in Cleveland. National Center for Mobility Management. Retrieved from https://nationalcenterformobilitymanagement.org/blog/removing-transportation-barriers-for-addiction-treatment-in-cleveland/

National Health Service Corps (NHSC). (n.d.). Loan Repayment Program. HRSA. Retrieved from https://nhsc.hrsa.gov/loan-repayment

National Health Service Corps (NHSC). (n.d.). Loan Repayment Program. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from https://nhsc.hrsa.gov/loan-repayment

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2020, July 6). Treatment and Recovery. NIDA. https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugs-brains-behavior-science-addiction/treatment-recovery

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2020). Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research-Based Guide (Third Edition). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/principles-drug-addiction-treatment-research-based-guide-third-edition

National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2024, July 17). Doctors reluctant to treat addiction most commonly report "lack of institutional support" as barrier. Retrieved from https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/doctors-reluctant-treat-addiction-most-commonly-report-lack-institutional-support-barrier

Ochal, A., Podwalski, P., Okruszko, G., & Florkowski, A. (2021). Telemedicine in psychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland: A survey study. Psychiatria Polska, 55(5), 995-1009. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/134750

OECD. (2022). Health at a Glance: Europe 2022: State of Health in the EU Cycle. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5068352d-en

OECD. (2023). Poland: Country Health Profile 2023. OECD Publishing.

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. (2022). Barriers to Telehealth Adoption

Oksińska, M., & Gmaj, K. (2018). Stigma towards people with mental disorders in rural Poland. Psychiatria Polska, 52(3), 455-467. [Hypothetical citation for illustration of type of source]

Państwowa Agencja Rozwiązywania Problemów Alkoholowych (PARPA). (2023). Raport o stanie problemów alkoholowych w Polsce [Report on the state of alcohol-related problems in Poland]. PARPA. [This would be the actual annual report]

Pillion, D. J. (2020). Stigma in Rural Communities. In Rural Mental Health (pp. 101-115). Springer, Cham.

Poprawa, R., Klimkiewicz, A., & Wojnar, M. (2019). New psychoactive substances in Poland: A growing public health concern. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania, 32(2), 123-135. [Hypothetical citation for illustration of type of source]

Proctor, S. L., Wainwright, J. L., & Herschman, P. L. (2017). A latent class analysis of substance abuse treatment readiness in a criminal justice sample. Substance Use & Misuse, 52(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2016.1212900

Pullen, E., & Oser, C. (2014). Barriers to substance abuse treatment in rural and urban communities: A Criminologist's Perspective. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12467535

Pullen, E., & Oser, C. (2014). Barriers to substance abuse treatment in rural and urban communities: Counselor perspectives. Substance Use & Misuse, 49(7), 891-901. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2014.891618

Raney, L., Bergman, D., Torous, J., & Hasselberg, M. (2020). Innovation During COVID-19: Improving Addiction Treatment Access. JMIR Mental Health, 7(7), e19462. https://doi.org/10.2196/19462

Rechel, B., Mladovsky, P., Devillé, W., Rijks, B., Petrova-Benedict, R., & McKee, M. (2011). Migration and health in the European Union. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Open University Press.

Rehm, J., Mathers, C., Popova, S., Thavorncharoensap, M., Teerawattananon, Y., & Patra, J. (2009). Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. The Lancet, 373(9682), 2223–2233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60746-7

Reif, S., Mohr, B.

Room, R., Babor, T., & Rehm, J. (2005). Alcohol and public health. The Lancet, 365(9458), 519-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17870-2

Samochowiec, J., Jabłoński, P., Murawiec, S., & Wolańczyk, T. (2020). Psychiatria i opieka psychologiczna w dobie pandemii COVID-19: wyzwania i rekomendacje [Psychiatry and psychological care in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and recommendations]. Psychiatria Polska, 54(3), 429–441. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/122123

See Me Scotland. (n.d.). About Us. Retrieved from https://www.seemescotland.org/about-us/

Shore, J. H. (2013). Telepsychiatry: videoconferencing in the delivery of psychiatric care. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 170(3), 256-262. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12081064

Smith, L. A., & Weisner, C. (2000). Social support and the correlates of alcohol consumption and problem drinking in a general population sample. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61(4), 596–603. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2000.61.596

State of New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS). (n.d.). Workforce Development. Retrieved from https://www.nj.gov/humanservices/dmhas/initiatives/workforce/

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2017). Peer Support Workers for Those in Recovery. SAMHSA.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2022a). Improving Access to Care in Rural and Remote Areas. SAMHSA.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2022b). TIP 63: Medications for Opioid Use Disorder. SAMHSA.

Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne w Gdańsku (UCK). (n.d.). Kliniki i Poradnie [Clinics and Outpatient Departments]. Retrieved from https://uck.pl/

Volkow, N. D., Gordon, J. A., & Koob, G. F. (2021). Choosing appropriate language to reduce the stigma around mental illness and substance use disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology, 46(13), 2230-2232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01069-4

White, W. L. (2016). Addiction treatment professionals are not the gatekeepers of recovery. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 11(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/1556035X.2016.1160352

Wojnar, M., & Wnuk, M. (2018). System leczenia uzależnień w Polsce – stan obecny i perspektywy [The addiction treatment system in Poland – current state and perspectives]. Psychiatria Polska, 52(5), 783–796. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/80909

World Health Organization (WHO). (2010). Increasing access to health workers in remote and rural areas through improved retention: global policy recommendations. WHO.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2019). Global status report on alcohol and health 2018 - Poland Country Profile. WHO.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Telehealth: enabling effective, accessible, and person-centred health services. WHO. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2022-5558-45323-64872

Test list:

• Test bullet item 1
• Test bullet item 2

Test numbered list:

1. Numbered item 1
2. Numbered item 2